You're right...I just didn't want to confuse things

You're right...I just didn't want to confuse things
by ndzippy (2018-12-12 12:01:03)

In reply to: Correct me if I'm wrong posted by RallyingSon

Sagarin's model is pretty complicated, with four different predictors. I went with the "RATING" factor because it's a (in his words) "synthesis of the three different SCORE-BASED methods".

A more accurate statement would have been, "Sagarin's model has Clemson by 4.24-12.41 points".

Replies: