In reply to: Correct me if I'm wrong posted by RallyingSon
Syracuse or Northwestern might be considered better wins than Michigan.
Because they overvalue home/away and overvalue point spread.
If anything, people could (probably reasonably) argue that we would’ve beaten Michigan by more with Book and Dex.
I think the “can’t have it both ways” is more applicable to people looking at the close A&M/Syracuse results for Clemson while not factoring in Lawrence wasn’t the QB for most of those games, yet still claiming Vandy/Ball State as flukes because of no Book.