Interesting - I thought it was. *
by eddysorin (2019-01-09 13:17:10)

In reply to: No.  posted by KeoughCharles05

Post Reply Return to Rock's House

This user did not provide content for this post

Well, the court's holding is essentially that it implicitly
by ratinatux  (2019-01-09 15:22:56)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post

is included, because the collective bargaining agreement included a waiver of any challenges to the NFL's bylaws, and the rule is in the bylaws, such that the rule is part of the "unique bundle of compromises" between the PA and the league.