In reply to: Very likely, no doubt posted by ACross
a TD then goldilocks and company would have been rattled. SACK...FUMBLE...POUNCE
punt, and then had the ball with great field position and then fumbled on the first play?
Was that the replay refs fault as well? Did we get screwed on that one? That sequence certainly hurt our confidence.
We have nobody to blame but ourselves.
I was surprised to see the replay show that Book fumbled, but in order to overturn the call there needs to be clear evidence of a recovery. After the fumble, you couldn't see the ball until the Clemson DL stood up with the ball sitting on the ground. There was a clear opportunity for a recovery, there was no clear recovery. Then later in the game Mack made the catch, made a football move (turning upfield with possession), and was ruled incomplete. None of the calls affected the outcome of the game, even cumulatively, but all three were egregiously incorrect and all three went against us.
we completely fuck up and cannot execute the basics of the game and it's the refs fault (of course).
"Oh, but I said none of the calls affected the outcome of the game!"
that's a pretty consistent message that I've heard most successful coaches/leaders harp on a lot these past few years and I agree with it.
Truthfully, it's probably just a ripoff of what Holtz/Saban/Meyer would do.
... when we were methodically driving into Clemson territory and your favorite 5-star couldn't hang on to a crucial catch to help extend a drive?
Although I think replay got that one wrong too - but jesus christmas, hang on to the damn football.
when we had the easy third down conversion and our wr just dropped the ball at the sticks.
Motherfucking replay refs screwed us on that one!
Clemson would have just crushed us for the full second half. Book couldn’t do crap all game and that wouldn’t have changed and we still wouldn’t have scored near enough points.