Yes, I'd argue we got screwed on that one as well

Yes, I'd argue we got screwed on that one as well
by LuckyMcD (2019-01-13 16:28:28)
Edited on 2019-01-13 16:30:58

In reply to: how about after we stopped them on defense, forced the posted by jt

I was surprised to see the replay show that Book fumbled, but in order to overturn the call there needs to be clear evidence of a recovery. After the fumble, you couldn't see the ball until the Clemson DL stood up with the ball sitting on the ground. There was a clear opportunity for a recovery, there was no clear recovery. Then later in the game Mack made the catch, made a football move (turning upfield with possession), and was ruled incomplete. None of the calls affected the outcome of the game, even cumulatively, but all three were egregiously incorrect and all three went against us.

Replies:

You'd argue wrong. Clear fumble and recovery. * - tdiddy07 2019-01-14 14:29:22
good Lord - jt 2019-01-13 20:32:15