Just guessing but I would think the reason
by TWO (2019-04-22 21:02:20)

In reply to: What was the reason given for the TD reversal? *  posted by Finn_MacCool

Post Reply Return to Rock's House

was the replay thought his right knee came down out of bounds before his right foot did...so not a catch. The whole broadcast might have shown more angles and slow mo that showed his foot down before the knee. I guess when he got possession is also a factor. That'd have sealed it! But I was happy with the sealing being the defense forcing Patterson to cough up the ball!







no, if you re-listen to the play
by jt  (2019-04-22 21:53:16)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post

as those two dipshit announcers are talking you can hear the ref calling out the illegal formation.

This was not a replay reversal.
Yep, you’re right. Who was covering up Boykin? And isn’t
by 1NDGal  (2019-04-23 21:17:38)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post

that pretty basic football — watch where you line up?

Was it Mack?
wr was covering up the TE
by jt  (2019-04-24 10:45:42)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post

end man on LOS is eligible; if the wr lines up "on" the line of scrimmage, the TE is ineligible. WR needs to line up "off" (basically considered in the backfield even though he's split wide) so the TE can go out for a pass. This is considered the "flanker."

If there is no TE to that side of the formation, the wr needs to line up "on" and cover the tackle, who is ineligible by position and by number (unless he reports). This is the "split end."