Which makes sense until you start looking at what you mean

Which makes sense until you start looking at what you mean
by Steelhop (2019-05-15 13:47:39)

In reply to: Only way out of that .. posted by TWO

by that. Most people think that only means the revenue producing sports - football and men's basketball. But, as soon as you pay them, you also have to pay your scholarship non-revenue sport's players the same amount. This why about 5 years ago the NCAA was said they were thinking about it but ran the numbers. Just not going to happen.

I can get behind a likeness revenue type of model but, as someone said, the school should get a cut of whatever a player generates e.g. does the ND player wearing no 3 get someone to pay for his autograph because he is good or that number 3 is a big number in ND lore. My guess is that it is a little of both.

Replies:

could a different governing board be created - fourputtmd 2019-05-15 17:08:05
and title IX. They have to pay women an equal amount. * - 84david 2019-05-15 14:13:23
- They wouldn't pay them, they would drop the progrmas. - weirdo0521 2019-05-16 12:04:33
  - Schools would have men's fb and bb only - Irish Warrior 2019-05-16 13:44:26
    - Bingo * - weirdo0521 2019-05-17 16:43:52
ND and other schools would maintain their licensing - jt 2019-05-15 14:03:33