Good, not great talent, finishing high, but not too high *
by SEE (2019-05-30 21:15:43)

In reply to: SEE the theoretical astrologist  posted by ThreeD

Post Reply Return to Rock's House

This user did not provide content for this post

By that metric, we're Wisconsin already, at best.
by ndtnguy  (2019-05-31 10:50:36)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post

There's no "becoming" about it.
if his point is that (at least until the last couple of
by ACross  (2019-05-31 14:25:21)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post

commitments) we have shifted our focus to what we consider our wheelhouse - the sub-elites and/or self selectors, then I think his point is fine. And as a program I am not sure we aspire to win national championships or we would have shitcanned a head coach who manifestly cannot win one. We made a conscious choice to to retain him, well aware of his limitations and ceiling.