In reply to: To be honest, I don't see that as an abuse. posted by KeoughCharles05
early signing dates, LOI, not being able to leave if a coach leaves, etc.
It's all to make the school and fans happy.
But that it would be transferred to a non-athletic scholarship to fulfill the academic commitment ND made the player. I don't see anything wrong in terms of the school's personal commitment to the player. But it's an obvious bad-faith evasion of NCAA scholarship limitations. And the NCAA should more closely enforce manipulating medical scholarships. Particularly when it is offered to a player who then gets cleared to play elsewhere without much difficulty.
and favor the teams with the most money?
But that's not a concern about player welfare. That's a concern about abiding by NCAA rules. I don't give a flying fuck about NCAA rules as such. They're arbitrary and meaningless.
that prevent playing FB and coaches’ decisions that the New Kid is better so byeee.
For example, Corey Robinson. He decided he liked his brain after having two (three?) concussions. Medical scholarship, finish your degree, go with God.
A licensed medical professional would have to lie, jeopardizing their entire career, in order to enable a school to abuse that rule. The kid blew his knee or he didn’t. He is at risk of paralysis from one more hit (Danny Spond, we will love you forever) or he isn’t.
I'm talking about cutting a healthy player from the team because he didn't turn out to be as good as the coaches thought when they recruited him.