Why is QB "not close"?
by doolinbanjos (2022-11-28 19:23:51)
Edited on 2022-11-28 20:37:10

In reply to: Supported by what?  posted by KeoughCharles05


I didn't think the QB situation in 2010 was necessarily any better on paper than what we have now.




Fair question
by KeoughCharles05  (2022-11-29 10:29:15)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post

On second consideration, I'd temper that, though still award it to the 2010 team, but it's probably not a "not close" scenario when Buchner's pre-season potential is taken into consideration.


Withdrawn *
by ACross  (2022-11-28 19:54:34)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post


I apologize.
by doolinbanjos  (2022-11-28 20:41:40)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post

It wasn't kind and I edited it. But the post I responded to made it tricky to defend our current crop of QBs. I think Pyne, Buchner and Angeli are, as a group, just as good as the crop in 2010.


I disagree.
by ACross  (2022-11-28 21:58:53)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post

Dayne was a top 25 recruit who had enormous potential but was irretrievably ruined by Kelly. I think we jumped the gun early on Buchner who had some bad luck in HS and never had the opportunity to grow or develop. I think we jumped the gun on Angeli too. I hope both prove me wrong