You have a very loose definition of "tried". Having not

You have a very loose definition of "tried". Having not
by Carlos Huerta (2024-06-16 17:11:39)
Edited on 2024-06-16 17:15:23

In reply to: Flagrant 1 was the correct call posted by Kayo

Post Reply Return to McGraw's Bench

watched the game I don't think in a vacuum I'd call a flagrant 2 there but it's a lot closer to that than it is to a common foul. That would have started a fight in a lot of games I've played in. If I were the WBNA I'd come down very hard on a player questioning the integrity of the officials on a play where there is no question she deserved the penalty assessed.

Replies:

That would have started a fight in ALL of the games - ram 2024-06-17 10:18:48
I watched the game - Kayo 2024-06-16 17:33:00
- I think the problem is intent. I didn't see the game - chicos bail bonds 2024-06-16 19:29:12
- It wasn't close to inches but regardless of that I don't - Carlos Huerta 2024-06-16 18:50:46
  - She has been full of it for a long time. * - Kayo 2024-06-16 18:59:16
- i agree it was the correct call, but not so sure it wasn't - kdh325 2024-06-16 18:30:09