It would be interesting to examine your consensus list of
by MPG (2018-06-04 19:17:50)

In reply to: Is the problem, the so many perceived problems?  posted by BabaGhanouj

Post Reply Return to McGraw's Bench

the top 15 or 20 prospects in a given year and then compare that list with the WNBA draft four years later or with more of a comparison of how well they did in their college careers.

Hmm…So start the comparison with the prospects' rating?
by BabaGhanouj  (2018-06-05 09:07:55)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post

That may be easier. I already have the top 15, 20, or 36 players (the 3 rounds of the draft) by average rating available for years 2014 through 2018. If anyone would like to see those lists I could easily post them.

Yes, perhaps you could release one of those lists every few
by MPG  (2018-06-05 13:26:27)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post

weeks during the summer. We could then discuss how those players did during their college careers and see if we can find any common factors that predict success for them and for their teams. Their WNBA draft status would be another marker to note.