PG is most noticeable against pressure from a top 10 team
by btd (2020-06-08 22:05:28)

In reply to: There isn't a must-have type of point guard  posted by Kayo


Yes, we did win a title sans a true PG. However, that same season we really struggled to get the ball up the court against the pressure UL brought -- and that was directly tied to not having a true PG and the top level ball handling skills that come with an elite PG.

We were able to overcome not having a PG because we had 5 WNBA draft picks starting. That's not something we can replicate annually.


Agree, it's easier to give the ball to
by BabaGhanouj  (2020-06-08 23:03:26)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post

a Lindsay Allen or an Olivia Miles and just be done with it, but the job could be adequately done with a group of good ball handlers. And the team might be better overall for it. I also agree it invites a pressure defense, which also must be considered. There's a reason most teams want a traditional point guard, as you say. It's easier. But again, as individual players improve all around play and get bigger, I can also see teams, like some men's teams and the NBA, preferring to do without the traditional point guard.

As I look this over, I'm more or less just agreeing with you without adding anything new, which, I guess, is OK also.