Isn't United for when two existing clubs join together?
by volley (2019-08-22 07:27:55)

In reply to: Heard St. Louis Legacy as a suggestion on the radio.  posted by Irishted


I've heard that the Brits think America's football philistinism is showing when they do things like calling brand new clubs Something United.


Yep
by wcnitz  (2019-08-22 11:11:46)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post

Lots of angst about Atlanta United when that name came out.


They may have a point.
by Irishted  (2019-08-22 09:10:30)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post

Real Salt Lake has always sounded rather goofy to my ears. To be honest, I really don't think any American team should be Real.


Perhaps the King of Israel can issue a royal warrant *
by fontoknow  (2019-08-22 16:33:20)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post