In reply to: Cold's post raised a question in my brain posted by El Kabong
He really is Midwest, Northeast and then Mid Atlantic but just down to No Va (really more DC and MD focus is most south he gets), and then very occasionally he's done a CA or MO. MD is now Big 10. G'town is Big East. I guess Northeast makes sense given history and BC, Syracuse. But I can't see any VA players south of DC metro, NC, SC, GA and for FL I saw two.
Meanwhile Michigan and Big 10 seems to have benefited from MD joining them. Michigan has taken some kids we might have gotten or had a good chance for in the past. So maybe the ACC-less MD was actually worse for us than a Big East when it comes to MBB.
Linked is an article from 2017 on where basketball talent is geographically.
The used to be an old adage within the admissions office that 80% of ND attendees came with x miles (forgot what the # of miles were) of the ND "hockey stick."
Chicago to New York City, flip up to Boston, flip down to DC.
I don't know if that holds anymore.
ACC quasi membership I think has been good for FB. I wonder how successful we'd be in NC, SC and GA without the ACC relationship. I haven't seen it help as much in MBB or WBB. Certainly I would think it has helped in MLax. Maybe BB too.
I don't sense we have gained BBall recruits from those ACC states (beyond a few from FL). They seem to still come mostly from the Midwest and Northeast and no further south than DC and No VA. But maybe that is just Brey's recruiting comfort zone.
P.S. Marquette had a recent top 100 decommit from NC. Maybe he'd be someone we are interested in (6'9" or 6'10" kid).