Golson Rescues Ailing Irish

Everett Golson passed for two touchdowns and rushed for another, accounting for 315 of Notre Dame’s 398 total yards in a hard fought 30-14 win over Purdue. The senior quarterback connected on 25 of 40 throws for 259 yards with no interceptions and 56 rushing yards as he willed a sputtering offense down the field. Meanwhile, Purdue’s Danny Etling’s quick, short passes confounded the Irish defense in the first half before Brian VanGorder’s depleted troops pitched a second half shutout.

The Irish were set up at the Purdue 45 yard line after a great return on the opening kickoff by Amir Carlisle. A few plays later, Golson hit a wide open Will Fuller on a short slant for a 7-0 lead. The game would not become a blowout, however, as the Irish defenders were lethargic at the outset and struggled to match the intensity of the Boilermakers, who dominated the next 25 minutes of the contest. Coach Danny Hazell negated Notre Dame’s pass rush and maximized the efficiency of his embattled quarterback by asking him to get the ball out immediately with safe outlet throws. Poor tackling by Notre Dame made this strategy even more effective, and the Boilermaker running game followed suit with quick hitters and counter plays.

When Etling hit DeAngelo Yancey with a 19 yard pass just three minutes befor halftime, Purdue put the Irish behind on the scoreboard for the first time this season by a 14-10 margin. Golson then took over at his 30 with three minutes on the clock, and later hit Corey Robinson on a 33-yard strike to put Notre Dame in scoring territory. With the clock ticking down, Golson took off from the pocket and beat the Purdue defense to the corner of the end zone for a 17-14 halftime lead.

This score seemed to steady the Irish, who during the previous 30 minutes had lost safety Max Redfield for the game due to a flagrant hit, along with cornerback Cole Luke, wide receiver Carlisle and backup safety Nicky Baratti to injuries. Offensive guard Christian Lombard and defensive end Andrew Trumbetti were already sidelined from injuries suffered last week, and four other pre-season starters remain out of the lineup due to injury or suspension. Adding it up, Notre Dame limped into the locker room minus nine first teamers and a key reserve.

The Irish defense played better in the third quarter after giving up an alarming amount of real estate before intermission. Good special teams play and long punts by Brindza tilted field position toward Notre Dame by the midpoint of the period, and Golson again found Robinson for a 15 yard touchdown that provided a bit of breathing room at 24-14 with 19 minutes to go in the game.

VanGorder’s halftime adjustments to tighten up his coverage despite a depleted secondary slowed down the Purdue attack, and the Irish made a key stop on fourth down in their own territory on the next series to turn away the last real Boilermaker threat with the outcome still in doubt. Two fourth quarter field goals by Brindza stretched the lead into comfortable territory and two late interceptions by Notre Dame put the game on ice.

Despite a frustrating night from an offensive standpoint for most everyone not named Golson and the loss of several notable defenders, the Irish held together. Alhough they did not win as easily as expected, other teams who recorded big wins last week such as Virginia Tech and USC found themselves at the wrong end of the scoreboard against unranked competition. Standing at 3-0, the team will enjoy and early season bye week at a very opportune time. None of the aforementioned injuries appeared to be serious, although Baratti’s shoulder has been a chronic problem.

Until they essentially ran out of gas, Purdue played at a high emotional level for much of the night and took the fight to Notre Dame. Golson was the difference in the game even though his passes were not as sharp and on target as in previous weeks, and he was also sacked four times.

Let’s review the pregame questions for additional insights on the outcome.

Can Purdue stay out of third and long situations? The Boilermakers did an excellent job of controlling down and distance. Many short passes on first down set up manageable plays leter in the series, and they moved the ball quite well in the first half. Coach Hazell put together a good plan and his players followed it well.

Will Notre Dame rejuvenate its rushing attack and lessen the reliance on Golson? The running game was not much to write home about, as the tailbacks gained only 83 yards in 24 attempts.

Can The Boilermaker secondary stay with the Irish receivers? With only a few exceptions, Purdue’s defensive backs stuck with Notre Dame receivers throughout the night and contested most every throw.

Which team will commit costly turnovers? Both teams commited a costly error in the first half, while the two second half interceptions by Etling halted any chance of a Purdue comeback.

Can the Irish special teams maintain their dominance? Notre Dame started well with a long kickoff return and got the better of the field position battle with long punts and deep kickoffs. Brindza hit three of four field goal attempts. The only negative was that his missed field goal from 50 yards jump-started Purdue’s first touchdown drive.

Will Purdue’s quick running backs find creases in the Notre Dame defense? Yes, especially in the first half. The Irish had trouble with the quick hitters until they tightened it up.

Can the Irish defense score a touchdown that is not called back by Big-10 referees? Credit Purdue’s game plan for the low risk approach that did not give Notre Dame much opportunity to apply pressure until late in the game, when two sacks and two interceptions helped seal the deal.

As Brian Kelly stated after the game, Notre Dame has plenty to work on in order to become a better and more efficient team. The offensive line needs to improve its run blocking and there were some pass protection breakdowns as well. Kelly, who insisted on chucking the ball at the point in the game when prudence dictated running down the clock, could stand to do some improving himself. Defensively the team regressed in its tackling and really needs to get back some of its key players. The Irish may find themselves among the Top Ten teams in the upcoming polls, but that is very much a precarious position at this stage of the season.

Categories

26 thoughts on “Golson Rescues Ailing Irish

  1. Too stressful of a game thru 3.5 quarters…stupid/minor question: can anyone explain why the first down graphic was missing from the telecast?

  2. John great analysis as usual. Not an inspired performance by O, D, or ST. All three phases struggled and had hard days at the office. Esp disappointed in the running game. And besides losing, the worst thing happened–we got banged up. Team needs to do some serious self evaluation, apply some Icy-Hot, and beware what happened to U$C last evening. We cannot bring lackluster performances like that and expect to survive October. But let us take some comfort in the W. As Charlie Weis said (probably the only morsel of goodness I take away from THAT relationship), it’s a lot easier to be critical after a W.

  3. Well, Purdue continued its recent tradition of scaring the bejeezus out of ND and punching way above its weight class. Having to come from behind is usually a good thing for a team, so this may prevent us from walking into future trap games. Golson definitely deserves the game ball for this win!

  4. This is the first Shamrock game that the IRISH did not come out fired up – with the new designer unis, et al. Nobody, not even us fans, took BK’s warnings about a let down seriously. However, a W is a W is a W. Top 10 this week with a well timed bye. GO IRISH!!

  5. Also a query: John do you or anyone else out there in ND Nation know what happens to the Shamrock Series uniforms? Given to a financially strapped HS team? Auctioned off for charity? Please tell me something good. If all that equipment just gets discarded I’m gonna puke.

  6. yeah, EG is the man, what a game changer. He had some not so good throws, but the guy is electric and the team is really on his shoulders (ie. little running attack). Hate to see guys go down, but pleased with depth and it forced BK to get younger guys much needed (real game) experience.

  7. The running game is not good and the inability to demonstrate that we can shove it in from the one yard line is an ongoing frustration. Could somebody tell our O lineman “You are 325 pounds, would you please knock someone over!”

    • Weebles wobble but they don’t fall down!
      Nice summary. I guess the lingering question is how good this team is compared to 2012?
      Prediction: heart attacks ahead.

  8. Golson is carrying this team, without him ND would be in trouble. It is funny that pre-season the buzz was the 3 running backs. They look ordinary without a good O line. It was good to see the depleted D step up in the second half. Hopefully the bye will give some players a chance to heal. I am not sure this young team is really at top 10 team. They will have to grow up fast (before October).

  9. Off topic… I think ND should apply it no alcohol rules to the Shamrock series. The drunks and foul language were discussing. .. and this was from college age girls. Many others just were fat drunk and stupid. It difficult watching children exposed to such behavior. Is the beer money that important to ND or is this NFL exposure ND wants its fans to experience?

  10. Excellent analysis. Mystified by the lack of a consistent running game. Also do not understand running out the clock by throwing the ball.Is our O line that bad?

  11. Golson Rescues Ailing Irish. Everett Golson passed for two touchdowns and rushed for another,
    in a hard fought 30-14 win over Purdue.

    I told you Purdue would be difficult.

    • They’re an objectively bad team, and the fact we didn’t play well against them should be cause for concern.

      This wasn’t a Bob Griese-led squad here.

  12. I’m wondering when you considered the game to be over or when did “prudence dictate running out the clock?” ND didn’t throw a pass on its final possession and the previous two were scoring possessions. It seems overly critical to second guess the play calling on those drives, the first of which began with 14:39 in the 4th quarter remaining and a 10 point lead.

  13. This offense looks a lot like the previous 4 seasons except they have a playmaker at QB that bails them out with his feet at times. Poor running game, especially in short yardage and the red zone. Kelly’s version of the spread has been underwhelming. If you have your guys, it’s year number 5, and it still isn’t effective recruit a FB and scrap the spread. The game still comes down to running the ball and stopping the other team from running the ball. Good to be 3-0, but all three of these teams were weak. ND needs to improve in a lot of areas before October.

  14. That’s the difference between good teams and great teams. Great teams struggle sometimes but, at the end of the day, they always find a way to get the W. Not to say this team is overly “great” yet, but the pieces of the puzzle are there and the depth that Kelly has been talking about building is there, meaning the Program is in good shape. Defensively we’re talkin’ back ups to the back ups! in many cases playing and they still pitched a second half shutout. Offensively it’s the Golson show. I actually agreed for once with the what’s-his-face annoying announcer guy, Hamhock? Running G 14+ times including in the 4th with the lead is goin’ to the well a little too often. The offense has SO much at stake with that young man. I sure hope he keeps on holdin’ it together. And coincidentally, whether we have a lot of injuries at the moment or not why put the bye week in week 3? That’s sort of sucky, big picture. Not much room for complaint here by why is Brindza so perfect on field goals except the first one he tries? Maybe it’s a nerve thing and he has to get the missed shot out of the way first. Go Irish!

  15. 1.) Made a bad team look good again!
    2.) “Let Down”….fooey!!! Oregon had a big game last week with MSU ….. then OU blewout their weak team out this weekby 48-14….which should have been our score!!!! No more just beating teams!!! DESTROY THEM!!!
    3.) So much for the high powered offense which looked to conservative to me with the exception of some big plays!
    4.) Made same mistakes last night that we ‘ve been making the two previoouos games. Only difference was with the other two is we were blowing them out and Purdue exposed them last night. I’m sure Stanford, SC, ASU, and FSU are taking notice!
    5.)Another take notice last night that Golson can get rattled!!!! He doesn’t shake things off easily!!!
    6.) O-line needs to block better on passing plays and need to dominate on the SMASHMOUTH PLAYS!!!!
    7.)This is BK’s 5th year at ND, sick and tired of how young we are…..ALabama, LSU, Georgia Oklahoma have young players and they step right in and do not need “time to grow”!!! We rebuild….they reload….big difference!!
    8.)If we are suppose be considered an ELITE Program or close to….then we need to be blowing these teams out!!! It should have been 30-14 in the first half!!!!!
    9.) Lastly, a lot of young players and Malik lost valauble playtime last night because we ‘re friggin around with stupid play calling, undisciplined penalties, lack of intensity, lack of focus and no desire.
    10.) Good thing we have a week off! We need it! Get your crap straight! Better bury SU on the 27th!! ND is 1-2 vs them in recent years!!!!

    • Um, Oregon played Wyoming this week. They went 5-7 in the MWC last year. Purdue is still a Big Ten team with Big Ten talent. If they actually play, and they did, I would expect them to be better than Wyoming. Yes, yes, I know they lost CMU the previous week. That’s on Hazell.

      All that said, I agree with you, regardless of what Oregon did to whom last weekend. ND should have won the game by at least 17 more points. The missed Brindza field goal, in a dome no less, the Koyack fumble turned into a TD, and the missed opportunity on 1st and goal from the 2 in the 2nd Qtr all turned a 40-7 score into 30-14.

      There were other drives as well where the Irish didn’t do much without Carlisle in the game. Here’s hoping Hunter Jr. can be the dynamic Slot presence that has jump started the offense, while Carlisle’s out injured.

  16. Agree good to pull out a win when down and overcome adversity, and avoid a letdown after blowing out Michigan, especially in light of injuries.

    That a mediocre Purdue team can lead worries me that we may not be 9th best in the land, and Golson may not be able to run us to victory down against a Stanford/FSU/ASU/USC…

    Potential and work to be done. Playoffs probably a bit ambitious for this squad if I had to call it now.

  17. Maybe one should look at the history of the ND-Purdue series. On paper and on the field not always the same. This is maybe the lat scheduled Purdue game for a while. They wanted nothing more than to ruin another ND season. I am disappointed in the OLine play and the pace of the game. Kelly constantly wibds the clock to pick up the tempo but why doesnt that happen. Is EG reading and checking off too much? We need to force our will a little more in the running game.

    • As I said elsewhere, this was not Jack Mollenkopf on the sidelines, nor was that Bob Griese or Mike Phipps under center.

  18. The Irish never got their heads into this game. Still can not figure out why Kelly is determined to hand the ball off five yards deep when inside the three and goal to go. Why not line up in a wishbone inside the 10 like Holtz used to do? Overall a sloppy win, yes even Golson was the off the mark on occasion and several of the sacks caused by his refusal to move out of the pocket, but a W is a W. I hope Kelly takes Heistand to task on the pitiful run blocking.