Irish Wreck Georgia Tech

Notre Dame knew the battle against Georgia Tech would be a physical one. There was considerable hype surrounding the Yellowjackets as a rough and tumble team of brawlers. As it turned out, the Fighting Irish defense did the bullying as they shut down the Tech running game and eased to a 31-13 victory. Notre Dame scored in all three phases with three rushing touchdowns, a field goal by Zac Yoakam, and a late pick-six by safety Adon Shuler.

Once again, the Irish defense allowed an early touchdown before going into lockdown mode. Jacket quarterback Zach Pyron was sharp in the opening period as he led a march down the field. Tailback Jamal Haynes scored from one yard out after he recovered his own fumble on the goal line as the quarter expired.

Riley Leonard ran for two second quarter scores

Riley Leonard went to work for the visitors as they took control of the game. He scored rushing touchdowns on consecutive drives to put the Irish ahead by 14-7 just before intermission. Georgia Tech tried to answer but a muffed snap doomed a field goal attempt by Aidan Birr, who did not have a good day.

Notre Dame kept the momentum in the third quarter. The defense forced a three and out before Leonard went back to work. Passes to Jaden Greathouse and Beaux Collins set up a short scoring plunge by Jeremiah Love, who played like a man among boys all afternoon.

Pyron responded with a 60-yard completion to Abdul Janneh into the red zone. Riley Mills had his first of two sacks on the next series to force another field goal attempt by Birr. This time, Bryce Young swatted down the kick and Tech walked away empty handed.

Unfortunately, the Irish offense could not put the game away. Leonard began to misfire and Notre Dame squandered a 23-yard run by Jadarian Price with a series of mistakes and head-scratching play calls. The Jackets took over after a failed fourth down scramble by Leonard. Realizing that his running game was going nowhere, Tech Coach Brent Key ordered Pyron to throw the ball. Two plays later, Xavier Watts picked him off at the Notre Dame 44-yard line.

Leonard ‘s pursuit of a clinching score went awry after a holding penalty negated a scoring run by Love. Notre Dame had executed a fake punt where Love ran for a first down during this sequence but the drive did not result in a touchdown. The Irish settled for a 42-yard field goal by Yoakam, who extended the lead to 24-7 with ten minutes remaining.

Notre Dame teed off on Pyron as Georgia Tech’s situation become more desperate. It seemed as though a different Jacket player was being helped off the field on every play as Drayk Bowen, Kyngstonn Viliamu-Asa, Jaiden Ausberry, and a host of Irish defenders made crushing hits. Pyron was staggering around like Rocky Balboa as he absorbed shot after shot.

The Irish pulled out all the stops to score in the final minutes. They ran a successful fake field goal as holder Tyler Buchner darted for a first down at the Jacket 22 yard line. Unfortunately, Georgia Tech dug in a forced a 46-yard kick by Yoakam. It sailed wide right with under three minutes left.

Pyron provided an assist for Notre Dame’s clinching score on the very next play. His pass sailed over the head of his intended receiver and into the hands of Shuler. The sophomore ran untouched for 36 yards into the end zone for a 31-7 advantage. Tech exploited the Irish reserves in the final seconds to tack on a meaningless score.

This victory was another strong statement by Al Golden’s defense. You could almost hear the shouts of “No mas” from the Tech sideline as their pain and frustration grew during the second half. Notre Dame’s offense remains a work in progress, though. Leonard’s competence is limited to quick slants and screens. He is unable to execute an intermediate or deep passing game that might command respect from a future opponent. His receivers and linemen are part of the overall problem as well. Those plays require time to develop and proper execution that has not yet occurred. The Jackets were able to stuff a high percentage of running plays because their safeties were not burdened by a credible aerial threat.

Let’s review the answers to our pregame questions.

  • Can the Irish slow Georgia Tech’s downhill running game? Tech gained a measly 54 yards rushing. Most of them were the result of scrambles by Pyron. Haynes managed only 15 yards on eight carries.
  • Which quarterback will have greater success in the passing game? Pyron had more yards but he paid a heavy price. He threw two interceptions to one by Leonard. The Irish signal caller had a better game until midway through the third quarter. After that point he regressed badly.
  • Can Notre Dame’s young offensive line handle the beefy front four? The line had a mixed performance. Pass blocking was okay (not great) but the running game barely got off the ground (okay, that pun was pretty bad).
  • Will either team be able to pressure the passer? Pressure? Notre Dame nearly killed Leah Pyron’s eldest son.
  • Can the Irish receivers get open against the smallish Tech secondary? Possibly, but Leonard rarely found them. Love and Price consistently to run over these undersized DBs though.
  • Will special teams play have a bearing on the outcome? That’s a great question if I do say so myself. The Irish had a blocked kick and ran their own successful fake punt and field goal. The Yellowjackets muffed another three point attempt all by themselves.
  • Can Notre Dame force turnovers against the stingy Yellowjackets? By shutting down the run and forcing Tech to throw 36 passes, the two Irish interceptions seemed inevitable.
  • How will the young Irish cornerbacks perform under the spotlight? There were a few breakdowns but Moore and Hobbs are very exciting prospects. The team’s dire injury situation means their future is now.

Looking ahead, Notre Dame will travel to New Jersy next week to play a surprisingly good Navy team. All remaining games appear to be winnable on paper, which we know guarantees exactly nothing. This Irish team will go as far as its stout defense and youthful offensive line can take it. I believe we have now determined Leonard’s ceiling as a passer. That knowledge should keep everyone’s playoff related expectations firmly grounded in reality.

61 thoughts on “Irish Wreck Georgia Tech

  1. It seems to me to be so predictable when our offense is faced with a second and 2 or 3, we run the back right up the middle against a 6/7 man front for a loss or no gain.

  2. Thanks for the great write-up as always, John. Your “staggering around like Rocky Balboa” comment is the best line of the year!

  3. Is our running game so bad that we need Leonard to be a third RB? I cannot understand why Angeli has not been given a start to show what he can do. I watched him play in high school, and believe me, he can throw mid and long passes with accuracy. Why on earth is he being shunned?

    • Good question, Brian. I suspect the answer is multi-factorial. Certainly we can conclude confidently that Freeman et al made a pre-transfer commitment to RL that he would be the presumed starter, and barring injury remain such, in trade for being somewhat of a mentor for the younger guys in the “QB room.” Additionally, the O-line has turned out to be even worse than expected/feared, with our R tackle of recent years leaving for the NFL, multiple injuries, including lost-for-the-season Jagusah, having to use true freshman at L tackle, etc, etc. Also, it is very likely that Carr WILL be the presumed starter next year and given every chance to hold that position, probably with Minchey as a change-of-pace backup, and Angeli moving on to greener starting potential elsewhere after graduating in the spring. Keeping RL as the starter keeps all that in place, as long as he doesn’t mess up too much, and he IS making some progress in his passing game, slow as that is unfortunately. Finally, his running ability is nowhere else to be found on the roster, and it keeps defenses honest, allowing for better results with Love and Price (even though they are woefully underutilized), and to some extent the RPO game, such as it is; and even more so a play action game, if only we could get better pass blocking more consistently. The play calling? Well, that’s another story altogether……..

      • Have to disagree with the transfer commitment comment, and the Angeli comment.

        I agree with everything that has been said about RL passing deficiencies.

        But with this OL, without RL running, this offense is a dead stop. Nothing. No chance. How many sacks has Angeli suffered this year in a handful of plays.

  4. William F Schoelwer says:

    Leonard has not thrown long balls, and maybe he can’t, but as John mentions in his usual competent game summary, the O line and the receivers could help. Leonard is a shifty fast runner that allows him to gain yards and/or get away from defenders. But that brings risk of injury. I hope he dodges that bullet forever.

  5. This game went pretty much as I expected. Freeman’s winning formula continues to be play superior defense, run the ball effectively, pick the right spots to pass downfield, and avoid unforced mistakes. For the most part that plan worked effectively. Georgia Tech put up a good fight, but in the end they were outmanned. I continue to be impressed with Freeman’s new focus on game planning and his ability to recruit young talent. Yes, the injuries have weakened the team, but they have also given our talented young guys the opportunity to gain experience and confidence. Freeman’s future is better than ever, but he will still have to suffer through one or two more defeats this year. This program continues to be a work in progress. It’s quite interesting that the two remaining teams on our schedule that were supposed to be our biggest challenges…FSU and USC…both have losing records, and the two teams that were considered to be push overs…Army and Navy…are undefeated and absolutely crushing everyone on their schedule. Next week’s Navy game in New York will be a real test for the young guys on the defense who have never faced an option offense. It’s also going to be a real challenge for Al Golden to figure out a way to show down a Navy offense that is for the first time in forever is throwing the ball effectively. I’m putting ND on upset alert.

  6. I am quite pleased and appreciative of how players have been stepping up and playing when front liners are hurt or out for the season. This seems to be a big improvement over recent years.

  7. Thanks for your fun after action analysis, John, especially when describing the beleaguered Georgia Tech quarterback. Unfortunately, I notice your recaps consistently use the term “head scratching play calls” when describing the Irish offense. Does our O line just need more time to grow as a unit? Or does Coach Denbrock just not see the same struggles we observe? His daring in calling 2 fakes makes him look good…because they worked. A consistent offense would make gimmicks unnecessary.

    • It’s the telegraphed running plays especially on short yardage that drive me nuts. They always get stoned for no gain because the defense knows what’s coming. Denbrock needs to mix it up. Also, we never seem to run a simple quarterback sneak on very short yardage instead of those slow developing runs.

      • John, your summaries always seem spot on. Thanks for all you do! What galls me is the universal use of the shotgun alignment on those very short yardage to go plays. 1-3 yards to go, and the play begins 6-7 yards BEHIND the LOS!! Insane. And it’s every time, without exception it seems. Of course, if we only played from under center on short yardage run plays, that would telegraph our intent as well, but some mix into the general flow of play calling could make that assumption much less valid. Someone as experienced as our esteemed and highly-paid O.C. would seem to be able to figure out a way to do better, or you would think anyway.

  8. Nice read and spot on analysis as always JV. Seeing this young OL gel was the best part of this game. I don’t believe they are tier one caliber yet, but we might not have a loss if they were this tight against NI. As long as it is not a steady thing, I liked the fake plays but wonder why we don’t develop more plays for our excellent running backs. Their talent overcomes many of the bewildering play calls. Having this kind of talent and not building an offense around them particularly with a QB that does not throw well seems like a huge waste of talent. It looked like they tried to keep Love a secret in the NI game. Price had an avg. 8.6 yards per carry and only had 8 carries. He has averaged 8.3 for away games. Is there a reason ND refuses to maximize this dual threat?

  9. Unfortunately, Leonard is Mr. Relevant to our success in the final few games. And his ceiling is way below a Brock Purdy “Mr. Irrelevant” in the NFL Draft. Just like his predecessor, he’s not a real Notre Dame man.

  10. While Leonard is a good running QB Angell is the better passer. Angeli should get more time. Love and Price are fast and strong. They need more touches.

    • ND fan in the South says:

      If Angeli is put in for a series now and then, the opposing defenses might have difficulty adjusting to more accurate long and short pass plays. This coming from another Sunday morning QB.

  11. Defense is playing like a national championship squad. Youth is being served! Should be enough to get us into the playoffs. Had to see Leonard mix it up at the beginning with the receivers. The last 1.5 quarters was rough to watch, it’s as if someone hit a pause button on the offense.

  12. The teams struggles and inability to move up in the polls despite the last 2 wins begins and ends with our QB. We need 4th down trick plays to try and run up the score to impress the pollsters, which only yielded 3 points and kept us mired in the 12th spot. Clearly we are losing the “eye test” competition. I can now envision winning our remaining games and not making the playoffs because of the offense, which is painful to watch. However, since I expect us to lose to FSU and USC who will be trying to salvage their lost seasons, it probably won’t be an issue. Those schools are infinitely more talented than Northern Illinois. Angeli deserves to start and it is unfair to keep a Notre Dame man on the bench in favor of a mercenary trying to make a buck. Especially when he is the better QB. I think it was Lou who said the use of trick plays belies a lack of confidence in being able to win straight up. I think he’s right.

    • I think the Notre Dame faithful better be ready for not making the playoffs even if they go 11-1. Based on past actions by the Committee they will likely take any 2-loss SEC over a 1-loss ND squad. Same might be said for any Big10 team with the exception of Indiana. ND clearly has the worse loss of any one or two loss teams and their SOS continues to fall like a rock. Be ready to scream folks.

  13. CaliradoJoeIrish says:

    Leonard still can’t throw the long ball, but has proven his running skills. Unless the running game improves and Leonard starts completing long passes to loosen up the defense, a disciplined team like Army could make headlines when the two teams meet. The last play of Q3 and first play of Q4 sure had me scratching my head.

  14. I’ve been following this site for several years. The analysis and comments are terrific almost without exception. After listening to the ESPN broadcast crew and other media sources, I have some concern that the Irish might be left out of the playoffs even if they finish 11 and 1. Am I being paranoid about SEC/ESPN influence and bias?

    • Not at all. The big conferences will use the Northern Illinois loss to lobby for more of their own teams to get in. ND doesn’t have any opportunities left for big game victories that sway the voters.

      Army and Navy don’t qualify no matter what anyone says.

      • ND fan in the South says:

        But Army and Navy are both ranked. If we beat both, we will have beaten 4 ranked teams. Not much of an argument, Vannie, but it’s all we have.

        • The Academies haven’t played anyone yet. Wins over them won’t elevate ND in the eyes of the playoff committee but losing to either of them will kill any hope of making it. Our best chance is to go 11-1 and hope that several teams ranked above ND will lose. Unfortunately, teams like BYU, Iowa State, and Miami don’t have any tough games left. It will be interesting to see how this unfolds but ND is very much on the bubble right now.

  15. After watching Alabama/Tennessee, Georgia/Texas and Miami/Lousville yesterday , I think that if we sneak into playoffs (50/50 in my book) – ain’t no way we go very far unless RL can throw more than 5-10 yards accurately. And ,as so many have said, run Price and Love a lot more – those dudes are studs !!! O line a little better – can only imagine Price/Love running behind a Holtz coached O line. After going up 21-7 I thought we would blow them out, but then RL’s lack of passing ability and strange(?)play calling still left GT in game. I will be at Navy game at MetLife in New Jersey Saturday and I am getting nervous. I believe it was 2010 when I watched Navy skunked us 35-17 at MetLife.

  16. Minchey. Might be the best quarterback in FBS who does not play. Below line may advance to being number 62 among all FPS teams. Successful season would be winning one or heaven forbid two Playoff games. Skeptical that they can beat both army and Navy. The LA Colosseum has been a graveyard for ND over the years. Still remember Anthony Davis dancing on his knees. We’ll see.

  17. Nice summary of the ND vs GT game John! Always happy with a win and even more happy the defense held GT to 64 rushing yards!! Great timing to see the run defense step it up because they are going to need to play the same way vs Navy’s running game!!

    Will be at the game this coming Saturday and I can’t wait!! GO IRISH BEAT Navy!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  18. It never ceases to amaze me on this board how spectators are so confident that they could call a better game than the $2 million a year offensive coordinator. Denbrock had the number one offense in the country last year. He has a track record of excellent offenses. He actually gets paid to coach football, and practices with these guys every day. He studies film of opponents constantly. It’s his first year back in South Bend, and his offensive line has only two of his preferred starters playing right now. The offense has continually gotten better as has the QB. Y’all are delusional.

  19. John – had to take a day to consider comments . Irish are a mystery in a lot of ways. At times they show a very good Team and then they retreat to so-so. If they have any chance going forward the Offense must step up big time – play fast, control the line of scrimmage and show a deep threat with the passing game. Too many potential drives end with questionable play calling and lack of execution. Stops on 3rd down a must vs Navy as they will go for it on 4th down and short. Freeman still looks like he consults analytics guy on sideline when making decisions – shows uncertainty on his part. ND secondary will be tested vs Navy – ND will have to avoid 3 and outs on Offense. The big picture still cloudy as to where this Team ranks with the best teams.

    • I wonder if Freeman ever goes against the recommendations of the analytics guy based on his own observations and sense of what is happening on the field. That would be more reassuring to me as opposed to him blindly going with whatever he is told.

  20. ❤️#501988🍀🏈💪 says:

    The INCONSISTENCY on the OFFENSIVE side of the ball whether it is WR play, play calling, O-Line play, RL lack of being a leader is BAFFLING and OUT RIGHT DISGUSTING!!!!!!

    WE should have scored on every possession on Saturday (fgs or tds).

    I’m sorry but this team has a Playoff bound Defense but no way in hell do they have a playoff bound offense!!!! You thought the 42-14 drubbing by Bama was bad in the National Championship Game in 2012? Wait until the committee puts us against Georgia, it’s going to be even worse!!!!

      • ❤️#501988🍀🏈💪 says:

        🤣 GOOD ONE JV! Maybe 😉

        But in all seriousness, a work in progress on OFFENSE needs to be better than they are ALL AROUND. Don’t you agree?

        • Of course, but my highest expectations for this team have been postponed until 2025. The offensive line will be much better and so will the quarterback. My biggest concern will be the interior DL. I also assume we won’t have the same horrible luck with injuries two years in a row.

          • ❤️#501988🍀🏈💪 says:

            I agree. But we’ll lose A LOT on the defensive side of the ball in 2025 like Kaiser, Watts and Cross just to name a few. So now in 2025 we could possibly score a bunch of points BUT can’t stop anymore or impose our will on opposing team’s offenses.

            Also JV what do you make of these horrific injuries? Is this just football injuries or more underlying issues?

          • I believe the defense will be okay next year but Freeman will probably have to find a defensive tackle in the portal. Maybe a safety as well. The returning linebackers will be great.

            Playing on turf exacerbates the risk of injury but there may be more to ND’s terrible luck this season. I’m not sold on our new Strength and Conditioning coach. He was run out of Denver because the Broncos had a similar run of major injuries.

          • ❤️#501988🍀🏈💪 says:

            Thanks for the feedback JV I had to use this one because I ran out of replies🤣

            Two more ?’s and then I won’t bother you until next week. 🙂

            1.) Will ND go back to a grass surface.
            2.) Why in God’s name are we hiring a guy who’s team has similar injuries!?!?! Godd Ole Boys Club?

          • They probably won’t go back to grass but the current field turf has a few more years of life remaining before they have to make that decision. One of the stated reasons for going to turf in the first place was so they could host concerts and other events in the stadium. That hasn’t worked out too well for them.

            As for the S&C coach, they probably glossed over his actual results in Denver and just focused on his NFL experience. This is the same university that hired George O’Leary and botched the hiring of Andy Ludwig two years ago.

  21. I agree with the opinions that 11-1 probably won’t get us into the playoffs based on the quality of the remaining opponents. In my view we currently don’t pass the eye test because of the NIU loss, even though one could argue that losing to Vanderbilt is an equivalent loss. The best chance to make the playoffs remains improving the eye test with a new QB. That won’t happen but I can dream.😉

    • V thanks for your game summary! I will keep my comments brief . The coaches need to decide whether a quarterback change can help when our offense goes into a Coma . Other than that I thought we did pretty well!

  22. William F. Murphy says:

    Love the Rocky Balboa analogy. I’m hoping you can use it again after our Navy trek which now is far more than just a trap game. And I totally agree with your comment about our telegraphing plays on third and short. After last year’s drubbing of the Midshipmen and the recent outstanding play on defense, I am optimistic. But I can still hear the words “Northern Illinois” echoing in my mind. Not twice in the same year, no.

  23. paul argentieri says:

    John

    Because I´m about your age and for some reason our offensive linemen are taught to strike, grab and push rather than knocking someone on their ass with strategic head, shoulder and leg drive, with quick feet, that ND always did in their great running teams.

    Of course, the NFL is almost unwatchable in this regard.

    Just wondering about your thoughts as our running game is so inconsistent.

    Paul A.

    • I believe it is a combination of poor blocking and predictable alignments. On short yardage in particular, ND seems to allow too much penetration while the defense seems to know exactly where they are going to run. The wide receivers and tight ends have not blocked very well (unless they are holding) so Love and Price don’t get a chance to break off many long plays. Most of the yards they get are after first contact.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes:

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>