At the end of a week of internal squabbling that embarrassingly leaked into the public domain, Notre Dame buried the hatchet during Friday’s pregame meeting and proceeded to bury Navy on Saturday by 56-14. Seven rushing touchdowns powered the Fighting Irish, who raced to an early 14-0 lead and stretched it to 35-7 at halftime. Bob Diaco’s defense, which was shredded by the Midshipmen in last season’s contest, smothered the visitors by holding them well below their season average on the ground and only 33 yards through the air.
The victory did not completely erase the sting of three bad losses this season, but it will allow the Irish to refocus on their upcoming opponents and on week to week improvement. Manti Te’o led a strong defensive effort that shut down the Navy option attack. He was supported by Louis Nix, Stephon Tuitt and Robert Blanton, all of whom turned in stellar efforts. On the offensive side, Michael Floyd and Cierre Wood bounced back with strong performances and Jonas Gray scored three touchdowns.
Notre Dame scored on its first two possessions in very similar fashion. Each drive started with a flat pass that was turned into a long gain by Floyd and Theo Riddick, respectively, followed by a dominant ground game that produced scores by Gray and Wood. Navy got on the board early in the second period when the Irish muffed another backward pass deep in their own territory. Gee Gee Green capped off a short drive by taking a nine yard toss from Trey Miller to cut the lead to 14-7.
The turnover only served to set a fire under Notre Dame, who answered by scoring 14 points in the next two minutes. Tommy Rees hit a wide open Floyd with a 56 yard bomb immediately after Navy’s score, and Troy Niklas recovered a fumble on the ensuing kickoff to set up another touchdown run by Gray. Wood closed out the first half with a one yard plunge and the issue was no longer in doubt.
The Midshipmen tried to make it respectable after intermission, but its first two drives ended when they came up short on fourth down plays. Meanwhile, the Irish embarked on a long march that reached paydirt when Floyd beat the defense to the corner on a ten yard run. Gray scored again early in the fourth period to make it 49-7, but a Rees interception set up Navy for its final touchdown of the day by backup quarterback Jarvis Cummings.
Coach Brian Kelly finally went to his own backup signal-caller, but this time it was Dayne Crist rather than Andrew Hendrix. The popular senior led a successful drive to close out the scoring as freshman George Atkinson took it in from a yard out. Crist, who was cheered loudly by the home crowd, was three for three throwing the ball and looked sharp.
Notre Dame will hit the road next week for a date with Wake Forest. Although this game was really “a glorified scrimmage” in the words of one television commentator, the team needed to put last week’s loss behind them. The defensive line is still a concern, as the team lost freshman Chase Hounshell with what appeared to be a dislocated shoulder, and senior Ethan Johnson was held out of action yet again.
Let’s look at the answers to the pregame questions:
Will Miller have success in the passing game? Not at all. The touchdown pass to Green was a well conceived play, but Miller was only 5 of 13 for 33 yards and was under pressure all day.
Can Navy’s shaky defense fare any better than Air Force? Sure, they gave up three fewer points.
Will the Irish rediscover their running game? Definitely. The trick going forward will be to maintain that balance and not panic if they fall behind early.
Can Notre Dame stop the inside runs by the fullback and cover the pitch man? The Irish had a spot of trouble with the pitch man early in the game, but adjusted to effectively shut down the Middies.
Will Hendrix get another extended look and be allowed to throw the ball downfield? Hendrix never took off his baseball cap, but it was good to see Crist get a shot to put points on the board.
Can the Irish shake the turnover virus that returned with a vengeance last week? Unfortunately not. The two miscues set up Navy’s entire point total, and served as a reminder of what still can happen in a close game.
Will the Irish match Navy’s discipline (#1 in the nation with fewest penalties and penalty yards)? Notre Dame had six penalties to three by the Midshipmen, but that was driven by the fact that the referees turned a blind eye to several instances of blatant holding by Navy’s offensive line.
Despite a few ill-advised and poorly executed backward passes, the Irish performed well overall against the outclassed Navy athletes. Austin Collinsworth was the best special teams player on the field, and Navy’s longest offensive play was 15 yards. The objective at this point is not only to keep winning, but to steadily become the physical and mistake-free team that they will need to be in order to defeat Stanford a month from now. In this season of missed opportunities and catastrophic failures, a unified drive to a strong finish is the only way this group can live up to their enormous potential.
tjak says:
Well said. An honest and fair appraisal of this game. The only points the middies got were from Irish turnovers. These turnovers need to stop.
john o. says:
poor early defense but definitely got alot better during the second quarter and second half. good game Tommy rees.
aj says:
Agreed!! Any word on Tee Shepard and Deontay Greenberry? Last I saw, they were wavering! Godspeed Midshipmen!!
Ndtod says:
Guys, thisbteam is much improved from teams of last 10years. Trust in Kelly
IrIsHMaDmAn says:
Good solid play on both sides of the ball, and a nice win. GO IRISH!!!!!!!!
KellyK says:
If ND players will hold onto the football, and if Tommy Rees learns that a forward pass must move forward (or directly lateral), this will be a hard team to beat. Great individual talent has not translated into great individual effort through much of this season. Week after week the coaching staff puts this team in a position to win schematically, but the players don’t execute. Turnovers like they had today are okay against Navy, but not against Stanford and probably not against Wake Forest (?!). ND needs for its talented players to quit making bone-headed plays. Can that be coached?
GraceHallChapel86 says:
Whew! I am glad that ND didn’t play the frustratingly inspid “gentleman,” soft pedaling things after we get up a few scores. This blow out needed to happen this way.
rockne says:
NBC must go. The network has a bunch of hacks trying to create controversy where, given the way ND played, none existed. Before the game, Flutie said ND may be in trouble. After the game, he said this was nothing but a glorified scrimmage for ND. ND wins big so NBC’s conclusion-Navy is undermanned and injured. Further, the airhead blonde sideline reporters like Alex Flanagan must definitely go.
terry says:
I’m with you. The network does have a bunch of hacks doing the broadcasting – Pat Sajack and Vanna White could take over and no one would notice.
Alex looks excellent in whatever she wears but that’s about it.
ND – the institution – does seem to intimidate people who show up there, especially commentators.
The team? They beat up on teams they are suppose to beat up on.
Against USC? I quote The Observer – “It wasn’t even close.” Can’t put it much better than that.
Methinks we won’t really know what kind of team this is until we see how they do against Stanford. And I think the team feels the same way – last year Stanford kicked their butts all over the lot with Harbaugh on the sideline egging them on.
In South Bend.
That DEMANDS payback and there is only ONE
terry says:
way to administer payback.
martinjordan says:
This year’s seniors were the Nation’s number one ranked recruiting class coming out of high school and the best Kelly can do is 9-3 IF they win out.
DC Irish says:
CW would be 3-5 at best with this team
tjak says:
Agreed!!!!
martinjordan says:
Parseghian, Divine, or Holtz would go 12 and 0 with this team. They would have been ready to start the season and for USC. They NEVER would have had TWO long fumble returns in the same season and that ridiculous backward pass NEVER would have happenned TWO WEEKS IN A ROW!
I agree with the CW comment and the same goes for Faust, Davie, and Willingham.
GraceHallChapel86 says:
Those coaches certainly would have gone undefeated with them–but not in their first or second season. It takes time to purge the culture of losing, reinstill the culture of victory. I’m not even that crazy about Kelly, and sometimes I just flat dislike him. But the fact is it takes time. Kelly inherited more than just players of various skill levels, and it’s not Kelly’s fault that the University of Notre Dame has fumbled the football program with bad choices way worse than Crist fumbled that ball. And that’s saying quite a bit.
martinjordan says:
Parseghian went from 2 and 7 in ’63 to 9 and 1 in his first season with, essentially, the same players. Devine inherited Ross Browner, Luther Bradley, Rusty Lisch (lol) and Joe Montana. Holtz’s record didn’t improve immediately but the quality of football did. The costly turnovers, stupid penalties and flat performances of the Faust Era disappeared immediately. After a year and a half Kelly’s teams are just as sloppy and undisciplined as Wies’ making him another mediocre coach in what has become a procession of mediocrity since Holtz.
ScottB says:
I’d say this one points to the players and is likely the source of Kelly’s escalated frustrations. You can’t honestly tell me that Kelly didn’t come in with a game plan that was good enough to win each week. If the number one (although I’m not sure that’s exactly correct) recruiting class can’t hold on to the football and make better decisions in key situations, that’s on them at some point. Don’t think that Kelly isn’t working them in practice and making certain his players avoid these costly mistakes, but there is truly only so much a coach can do to change the psyche of a player.
I’m interested in learning exactly what Kelly has done in only a year and a half that is so irreconcilable. (Is it for righting the ship last year? Landing recruits who are already game changing? Making the best out of a bare cupboard quarterback position? Turning the laughable defense into a unit that plays with fire and makes necessary stops?)
There is something deeper and darker at play. The football culture at the university has become so stagnant and senile that it doesn’t even really know what the process of winning football looks like. Instead of embracing the current staff and cheering for the team, people around the program have become so bogged down in the politics of image and faded memories that they aren’t even rooting for victory unless looks and feel like it did sixty years ago. People talk about the glory days of Holtz and forget how eager they were for him to leave and be replaced by the younger and media-friendly Davie.
One thing I like about Kelly is the fact that he seems to have realized that he’ll have plenty of Notre Dame fans and boosters against him (and would no matter how many wins he collected). I like that he seems to enjoy ruffling feathers by talking about a new field or a jumbotron. I hate the music piped into the stadium, but I love what it represents. Like it or not, the coach is running the program.
Unless the culture changes, you can continue to look forward to five star recruits using the stage at Notre Dame as a platform to the NFL and nothing more. You can continue to enjoy sitting down at the stadium during crucial third down plays and having ushers making sure no one is blocking your view. If Kelly gets railroaded, you can continue to enjoy your program being manipulated by wealthy alums with no actual knowledge of the game. There are lots of things wrong with Notre Dame football. Brian Kelly isn’t one of them. Go Irish!
terry says:
Best post I’ve seen in a long long time. Thanks!!
Scott says:
Love it… LOVE IT!!!
Scott says:
I, for one, am sick to death of all of the PC “stiffs” that clutter the stadium week-in and week-out. My wife watches every game with me and even she has a problem watching home games. Why? Because there is virtually little to NO CROWD EFFORT!! And that is not due to lack of effort. It is the damn ushers and the damn “stiff” boosters and those who want it to be a “family environment”. This is not a national park, people. Notre Dame Stadium is a FOOTBALL STADIUM!!!
GraceHallChapel86 says:
Nice…
rockne says:
In order to win an NC a team must have a solid athletic QB who does not need to be a 5-star player but must play touch in the clutch and avoid errors.
Mike says:
Martinjordan, according to what rankings? They definitely were NOT the number one class. Way to make up stuff to try to prove an invalid point. Let me guess, you are the type of person who is never satisfied by anything. What a terrible life that must be.
Scranton Dave says:
You guys need to stop praising Rees, He IS NOT THE ANSWER. We saw what he does against a real opponent last week. He is only good against the teams that are overmatched. Hopefully someone other than Rees will be the starting QB the first game next year. He has no upside and cant lead us to a BCS win, which is Kellys stated goal.
MIKE R says:
How about a little gratitude? Reese has earned it, based on his record as a starter. He’s got guts and that sets a good example. Maybe there’s a five+ star who will supplant him, but be glad about the wins he’s helped realize so far. He’s a football guy, not a RoboQB, and he’s made the team go. I’m sure Michael Floyd has been grateful for seeing the ball as he has. Reese enables Floyd to be one of the two most dominant players in college football (we face the other when it’s time for Stanford).
Dave says:
Four catches for 28 yards against SC. Rees struggles with the good defenses and always will because of his limited ability. I’m grateful for the wins, but he’s also contributed greatly to the losses (Tulsa, USF, UM, SC.) He was lucky not to hang an L on us last year at SC too. I root hard for him every Saturday, but the record is misleading and there’s very little upside.
ed says:
Obviously, we still have along way to go.Let’s hope there are no letdown against Wake Forest.If I were Kelly, I would focus on recruiting and coachng,not on jumbotrons.
Dirty says:
I’m fairly certain that one can focus on coaching and recruiting while still mentioning the need for modernization of the facilities,
Give me a break. These things aren’t mutually exclusive.
Fitz says:
Man it felt good to finally manhandle Navy again. It’s about time! Hate to see a couple turnovers again, but in all fairness Rees interception was a good play by the linebacker who jumped the route. The lateral turnover was more disconcerting and I think Kelly should consider not calling that play anymore. Maybe stick with the quick underhanded toss to the side instead and the throws out to the sidelines to hit the perimeter. I agree to some extent with rockne. I’m not saying abolish the NBC contract of course, it’s great to know I can count on all ND home games being on a major, national network, but Doug Flutie’s cupcake analysis doesn’t do much for me. Navy is just 2-6 this year and Doug acted like ND was picking on them for winning big. No one gave us such sympathy when Navy beat us on a couple of down years. Well onto Wake Forest who is no gimme. But if the Irish stick together and keep raising their level of play like this we should definitely emerge victorious. Bring on Stanford!
rockne says:
Gee, I wonder if South Carolina, Air Force and Rutgers viewed their games with Navy as glorified scrimmages.
GraceHallChapel86 says:
Excellent point. That was a cheap shot on Flutie’s part. Would he have said that if we beat them 31-13? Oh wait, that’s the score by which we beat Michigan State…
Jim Kress says:
I was glad to see the team win.
Unfortunately, they still exhibit a lack of fundamental skills that is not acceptable. The turnovers, sloppy tackling, break downs in pass coverage, penalties and other fundamental mental errors are a clear indication this is just not a ND Class football team.
One must remember that Navy has (arguably) the WORST defense in the FBS division of the NCAA. So, our ability to recover from our mistakes was much easier than it will be against our remaining opponents.
Wake Forrest represents a real threat. I hope the team decides to focus on cleaning up fundamentals. They will need to do so if they are to win. If they play against WF, Maryland, Frodo and especially Stanford, the way they played against Navy, we will lose.
They have a long way to go to restore the tradition of ND.
GraceHallChapel86 says:
Poor Frodo! Hobbits should be left out of this! Did you mean /Fredo/?
NCHdomer says:
Enjoyed victory over an overmatched Navy team. Heard that after last years loss the rules on cut blocking were changed. Not sure if that impacted margin of victory.
Liked the music before each kick-off. Seemed to ignite the students. Music played on third down just before opposing team snaps ball is bush league (especially when juxtaposed with display of sportsmanship after the game with the Navy alma mater being sung). If someone did that to us we would cry foul. Uniform looks bad. Pants don’t match shiny new helmets, which looked like something out of movie Tron. Was the team going to play laser tag later?
BK seems to be emulating CW. ND is no longer about the Fighting Irish – its “the fighting Kellys,” to borrow a phrase used by ESPN occassionally when talking about other teams. In less than 2 years he has changed at least two traditions (team walk from Sacred Heart and paining helmets on Friday before game) and has his sights set on a Jumbotron and Field Turf (he probably will get around to athletic dorms if he lasts beyond next year). This guy is hovering around .500, with some of the most egregious and boneheaded losses in the history of the program – a master at snatching defeat from the jaws of victory. And the anwer to those losses is to make it hard for the other team to call their plays on third down by playing loud music up to the snap of the ball. Didn’t seem to hurt USC. Maybe he should try doing his job better by coaching proven defensive schemes and techniques that actually are successful (like defensive backs turning around and knocking the ball down). Or maybe he should get USC and Michigan replaced on the schedule with Western and Eastern Michigan.
Calling out your own players publicly says it all. People in Cincinnati do not have a high opinion of him and it goes beyond him not going to the final bowl game coach his team. Thought their view was unfair to BK. Not so sure anymore.
Dirty says:
Wow. Please provide some evidence that “people in Cincinnati do not have a high opinion of him.” Also, Kelly is nowhere near .500. Facts are fun.
Every Cincinnati, CMU, and GVSU alum I have ever talked to love this guy.
And I guess what you term as publicly “calling out” his players worked extremely well; they beat the hell out of a team that has owned them over the past 4 years.
I’m not saying Kelly is going to bring this team to the promised land, but give the guy a break. He isn’t going to turn this mess around instantly.
Actually, I doubt if this post was written by a Notre Dame fan.
Oh, and progress isn’t a bad thing.
Scranton Dave says:
That 2008 class was ranked first by Phil Steele. Crist, Floyd, Rudolph, Ethan Johnson and Trevor Robinson all 5 star recruits.
John says:
Kelly probably didn`t know that you could get that many 5 stars in one class.As of yesterday he just lost a 4 star out of next year`s class.His comments about his team probably didn`t help,nor his side line tirades.
rockne says:
Jim Kress:
I agree re mistakes but the situation is not nearly as bad as you say. Navy lost 5 games by a total of 8 points. It lost this one by 42.
rockne says:
Here is a trivia question:
How many Div. 1-A teams have NOT played (ever) a Div. 1-AA team?
Answer:
Three–ND, USC and UCLA!
Scott says:
One of the few reasons I have respect for USC.
Chuck says:
The “lateral pass” is an opponent’s touchdown waiting to happen. First time I saw this was Joe Theismann throwing to the receiver in the Redskins / Raiders Super Bowl where the Redskins lost with this same play. It was such a clean and beautiful interception by the Raider defense! Went into the end zone untouched.
irishhawk50 says:
It is good to see ND beat up on Navy like they are expected to do, but even Faust, Davie and Whittingham did that so I am not going to get crazy over that victory. ND should beat up on the likes of Navy, Purdue, Pittsburgh, BC, etc. Weis couldn’t manage that but I think Kelly will. That said, ND might be a top 25 team at the end of the year, but still has a way to go to be an elite team and I think Kelly has recognized that and said that to those who are listening. I am willing to say the glass is half full at this point. I will feel better if they rout Wake Forest, Maryland and BC, but won’t be happy until they go out west and beat Stanford.
K McDonald says:
I still have a headache from Saturday’s game–when did they start blasting that obnoxious noise over the hyper-amplified loudspeakers? It interfered with the announcer, the band, the cheerleaders and the crowd. For what?? I was at the game with my two teenage boys and a nephew, our first since the Navy game two years ago (much happier outcome yesterday, to be sure). But we were all disappointed with the added needless noise. Are we alone?
Scott says:
I’m a 40-year old man and I LOVE the change of atmosphere in the stadium. Homefield advantage is all about the audience becoming the “12th man”. Don’t like it, with all due respect, you have a living room where you can watch the game in a family setting.
Adam says:
Love your response. LOVEE THE MUSIC. On third downs its kinda forced, but on kickoffs it’s amazing. I think we should play Highway to Hell every time. That can be our signature move.
NCHdomer says:
The added noise was not enjoyable. I agree with KMcDonald but also observed that the students enjoyed it and maybe that is a sign of the times. As regards my comments about Cincinnati, I am from there and you only need to read the papers at the time he left to know the sentiment of the city, which is what I was referring to. I too know players from his prior schools and not everyone has a glowing impression. That is not to say he is not a good person. As far as calling out his players publicly, ESPN GameDay made that the second story of their show. I’m sorry, but if you need to do that to beat Navy, you got a problem. And please, let’s stop with the nonsense about how tough Navy is. They are great kids and fight hard all game. But the game should never be close with the talent ND has on its teams (and that is not a slight to any of the Acadamies – their athletes are not in those schools to get to the NFL. They have a higher calling and are probably truer to the ideal of the student athlete concept than any other FBS school). ND loses because of coaching and nothing more. The kids on any team do what they are told by the coaches or they’re on the bench, so it is ridiculous to blame the players for not trying hard. As regards progress, I dont see it. Humiliated on our home field by USC, a team on probation that we beat in the rain last year, looks like a step back to me. USF has shown it is not a team to reckon with despite their victory in the opener. Michigan got soundly beat by MSU, a team ND beat in a game that was tough but not a nailbiter. And needing time to rebuild, are you kidding? We have been rebuilding for 15 years. Every year we have a bumper crop of recruits and we finish slightly above or dramatically below .500. Finally, I stopped drinking Kool Aid a long time ago. Seeing the shortcomings of your team does not strip one of their position as a fan or as an alum. My alma mater taught me to alway question the party line and not to blindly follow the majority view. I see no reason to change. Like many people, I thought Davie, Willingham and Weis were in way over their heads long before the majority came around to that view. That doesn’t mean we had more insight than any other fan. What it means is that the people who attacked us personnally for those views were wrong – both in their resorting to personal attacks against fans who don’t share their opinions and, ultimately, in whether those coaches could bring ND back to prominence.
Jack says:
I still like Dayne Cryst. I want to see him in there. Yeah, he had that ugly fumble against USC but I think Cryst is the guy. Rees was chicken against USC – look at the tape. You cannot have a QB playing that is afraid to get hit. Rees – get tough please, that will make you better.
Bob from Minooka says:
I for one was not at all surprised by the outcome of this game. Notre Dame finally did what they’re supposed to do against a physically inferior opponent. Weather BK’s words pissed some players off or not, the physical difference between these two teams was like night and day and ND took full advantage…..as they should. With all do respect to the Naval Academy, they are a physically inferior team as is Air Force and ND beat them both like a drum.
Avon Domer says:
Here’s an off-the-wall prediction for you: For Kelly’s offense to run at peak efficiency it requires a quarterback that can run the football, and I wouldn’t be a bit surprised to see either Hendrix or Golson at the team’s starting quarterback next season after having a year and two fall camps under their belts. I’m not saying it’s going to happen, but it wouldn’t surprise me because while I like Tommy Reese, I do not see him as having the tools necessary to lead this team to its potential. He doesn’t have a strong arm and I don’t see him as a great leader, and he’s not built to run the spreak the way Kelly wants it to be run. We’ll see…
Haplo says:
Solid win by the ND team. Defensive was awesome. Running game was great. Tommy did a good job. However I believe for us to compete at a Top 25 level, either we need a major upgrade in quarterback play (like the USC Stanford game) or our offensive should have a solid running game and not depend on the quarterback to carry them.
Jeff B. says:
It gets old hearing so many of you complain about Brian Kelly and how terrible a coach he is. This guy has won everywhere he has been and will win at ND. There is no way you can compare Kelly to his last 3 predecessors.
ND is now doing a lot of things they have not done in years and that is a direct result of coaching. They have their best rushing offense in years. Their offensive line and defensive line has been dominant in all but 1 game. Take away the bad turnovers and this team may be undefeated. Don’t you think Kelly is just as surprised about the turnovers as us. Turnovers have never plagued a Kelly team before and they probably will not again. The majority of the turnovers came from inexperienced quarterbacks which should not continue to be a problem as they get more and more experience.
This is only year 2 and this team is starting to show flashes of dominance. You don’t become dominant overnight but this team is definitely trending in the right direction.
Go IRISH!
Scott says:
Agreed. Kelly is right where Holtz was in his second year after 21 games. And you could see flashes of dominance in those teams like we are seeing now by this point in Lou’s tenure. GO IRISH!!!
Colin says:
Kelly is a bit of a sore loser and has made some comments that we all wouldn’t like to see, but let’s face it – The Trib made a story out of what wasn’t really a story. I thought Kelly’s comments about Weis’ class and his class were rather benign. But we beat a team we should have beaten, and the players needed a game to let it hang out. And we hung it out to the tune of 56 points. Nice.
USC V Stanford was one of the best games I’ve seen this year. Although the SC game is one we all want to forget, despite coming out flat we HAD the chance to tie it at 17’s making it a whole new ball game with the tide turning to our favor. Although we tip our caps to SC for winning fair and square, I think we all feel that if we played that game to the team’s potential, it’s a whole different outcome – certainly a much closer competition then it ended up being. If SC can stand toe to toe with Stanford, we can too. But as every head coach will tell you, the focus is on next Saturday.
LETS GO IRISH!
irishhawk50 says:
Agree with Jeff B., but we’ll know more by the end of this season.
fitz says:
NCH Domer- I think if any people in Cinci harbor ill will towards BK it’s simply because he left town, which isn’t really fair to begin with, who could blame him for wanting to take his dream job at ND? I mean, he took you guys to your first ever conference championships and BCS games, how much hatred could really be warranted? I for one like Kelly’s grass roots past. Having come up as a program builder at smaller, middle America type colleges. It shows he knows college football and college kids through and through. As opposed to Charlie Weis who showed up flashing his super bowl rings like he was all that, and we all know how that ended. Let’s have a little more faith in the guy then that. He’s in his 2nd season and I can see some real progress here, in spite of a few games we should’ve won. Our record this year doesn’t indicate how good we are this year but compared to the last few years this team is much more solid and the future seems more bright (for real this time, not just through the rosey colored glasses of some fans based on ND’s distant past).
John says:
Can someone please ask coach Kelly to reduce the unnecessary non-football stuff and focus on Football?