Rebuilding Stanford Visits Rested Irish

Notre Dame (4-1) resumes its regular season on Saturday by hosting the Stanford Cardinal (2-3). The Fighting Irish had opened the 2024 campaign with a series of inconsistent performances and debilitating injuries. Last week’s bye provided an opportunity to rest, recover, and address the shortcomings on both sides of the ball. The Cardinal are coming off a pair of drubbings by new conference mates Clemson and Virginia Tech in the ACC. NBC will provide television coverage for this game starting at 3:30 pm Eastern time.

Coach Troy Taylor is in his second season in Palo Alto. He is making progress in his task to rebuild the program, although the path remains challenging. A mass exodus occurred after David Shaw resigned following the 2022 season, and Taylor is working to fill the gaps through recruiting. Unfortunately, the transfer portal has not been kind to Stanford this year as more players departed than came aboard. Even so, there are signs that Taylor’s efforts are beginning to gain traction on the field.

Taylor is known as an offensive innovator and was asked about the opportunity to attack Notre Dame’s defense. “I’d say the thing that distinguishes them the most is their ability to play man coverage pretty much throughout the game. They do a nice job of mixing in some zone coverage. But the passing lanes, the best defense you can play in football is really man-free, man coverage with a free safety, if you’ve got the guys who can do it, and they do. It makes the passing lanes very tight. You’re able to get pressure on the quarterback. Just their ability to play man coverage, hold down in the secondary and how physical they are up front.”

Notre Dame’s defensive line misses wide-bodied Gabriel Rubio

Regarding the injuries that have plagued the Irish to date, the news is decidedly mixed. The team had hoped to have guard Billy Schrauth and defensive tackle Gabe Rubio back this week. Both are unlikely to play. Coach Marcus Freeman also confirmed that rush end Boubacar Traore will miss the rest of the season. On the positive side, cornerback Christian Gray, wideout Jordan Faison, guard Sam Pendleton, and defensive end Josh Burnham will return to action.

Stanford quarterback Ashton Daniels will be available on Saturday after missing last week’s game against Virginia Tech. Daniels suffered a leg injury in the fourth quarter of the previous contest at Clemson. Backup Jordan Lamson filled in but it appears that Daniels will reclaim the job this week. Junior safety Jay Green and senior center Levi Rodgers, their most experienced lineman, are currently sidelined with injuries. Finally, highly regarded freshman tailback Micah Ford is listed as questionable.

NOTRE DAME’S OFFENSE vs. STANFORD’S DEFENSE

Stanford is playing a 4-3 alignment this year led by end David Bailey and tackle Anthony Franklin.  Bailey is a dominant athlete who can rush the passer or drop into coverage. Wilfredo Aybar and leading tackler Tristan Sinclair are experienced and impactful linebackers. Stanford is among the top tier in the nation at stopping the run but opponents have exploited their relatively weak secondary. The Cardinal will try to push Notre Dame out of its comfort zone by creating third and long situations.

Rush end David Bailey (23) is the best defnder for the Cardinal

Taylor began the task of improving his front seven by hiring talented assistant coaches from the Wisconsin Badgers. These changes have worked well to date. A transfer from Yale, Clay Patterson, has brought a more physical mentality to the group. He is an excellent pass rusher in addition to being a valuable run stuffer.

Stanford has reshuffled its secondary in the wake of considerable turnover in personnel. Most of the current starters were reserves on last season’s porous unit. Safety Mitch Leigber and cornerback Zahran Manley have emerged as leaders but the group remains a work in progress. Green’s injury has removed an experienced depth piece from the board.

The matchup between the Cardinal front and the young Irish offensive line is critical. If Notre Dame can run the ball, several opportunities in the passing game will open up. This includes screens and play-action. Should Stanford win this battle in the trenches, the game will become a close, low-scoring affair. An extra week of preparation should give Mike Denbrock an opportunity to refresh the offense and become less predictable. There is no question that the inexperience of his offensive line has limited Denbrock’s play selection to date.

STANFORD’S OFFENSE vs. NOTRE DAME’S DEFENSE

Daniels has struggled this year with a 59% completion rate. He has thrown more interceptions (six) than touchdown passes (five). Daniels is a good athlete and leads the team in rushing despite missing a game. He has struggled with decision making and frequently lacks poise in the pocket. Poor protection is an issue but some of the turnovers and unproductive possessions are due to unforced errors.

Elic Ayomanor has three touchdown receptions this season

Leading pass catcher Elic Ayomanor is the best weapon for the Cardinal. He is supported by three young slot type receivers in Tiger Bachmeier, Ismael Cisse, and Emmett Mosely. Their forte is using quickness on crossing routes to get open in the short zones. Tight end Sam Roush has established himself as a legitimate target after the veteran Ben Yurosek transferred to Georgia. Daniels is primarily a short and intermediate thrower with very few completions of significant length.

The offensive line features three sophomores, while true freshman Kahlil House has surpassed senior Jack Leyrer at left tackle. With Rogers on the sideline this week, another youngster will likely be promoted to the starting lineup. Despite their struggles in pass blocking, this group is much better in the running game. The rotation of tailbacks Ford, Chris Davis, and Sedrick Irvin have been very productive on counter plays and in using two back sets. Daniels and Lamson execute the read option well and are not afraid of contact.

Cornerback Christian Gray is back in the lineuo for the Irish

Notre Dame’s cornerbacks will be challenged to defend Ayomanor on slants while the other receivers run various rub routes or pick plays. Expect Notre Dame’s Al Golden to give different coverage looks to cause Daniels to hesitate or make mistakes. The Irish should be able to apply pressure given Stanford’s inexperienced offensive front. He must also keep in mind that Daniels and Lamson are effective runners who can do damage when they escape the pocket.

More importantly, however, Notre Dame must improve its run defense. A depleted front line and young linebackers have been gashed more often than anyone anticipated prior to the season. At times a lack of size has been an issue while missed assignments and poor gap fills have also contributed in a negative way. We will see if the staff has addressed these deficiencies during the break.

SPECIAL TEAMS

Notre Dame’s special teams have been solid for the most part. Kicker Mitch Jeter is consistent while punter James Rendell has improved after a shaky start to his career. Unfortunately, a few glaring mistakes and breakdowns have been costly. Blocked field goals and fumbled kicks are not the hallmark of a playoff caliber team. The Irish have no margin of error remaining with one bad loss already on the ledger. Another disaster in the kicking game could end their dreams this season.

Tiger Bachmeier is a threat as a receiver and punt returner

The Cardinal lost kicker Josh Karty to the NFL but Emmett Kenney appears to be very capable.  Kenney has converted eight of nine field goal attempts and all of his extra points. Punter Aidan Flintoft sports a 42-yard average and rarely leaves room for a return. Reserve wide receiver Bryce Farrell is the primary kick returner while Bachmeier has a 90-yard punt return for a touchdown this season.

SUMMARY

These teams have similarities on offense with youthful lines, quarterbacks that run well, and talented tailbacks. Each team has a short passing game that has not been consistent to this point. Notre Dame has a superior defense, particularly in the secondary. If not for the injuries along the Irish front four, the Cardinal would not figure to score many points.

Tackle Aamil Wagner is a steadying influence on the Irish offensive line

Taylor’s offensive innovations will likely yield some success early in the game. At some point the Notre Dame defense will assert itself and win the majority of the battles up front. This will lead to mistakes and a couple of turnovers. Unless the Irish offense is equally sloppy, the hosts should pull away during the second half.

Here are a few questions that will shed light on the outcome:

  • Can Stanford’s young offensive line handle the depleted Irish defensive front?
  • Will Notre Dame’s cornerbacks contain Ayomanor and the Cardinal receivers?
  • Which team will be more successful on third down?
  • Will the Irish passing game improve following the bye week?
  • Can Notre Dame run the ball on the Cardinal front seven?
  • Which defense will be able to create turnovers?
  • Can Notre Dame’s special teams avoid crucial mistakes?
  • Will Daniels or Riley Leonard win the matchup of the quarterbacks?

PREDICTION

Notre Dame fans would like to believe that the extra rest and practice time will reinvigorate the Irish. They certainly have a veteran, well-compensated coaching staff that should be able to diagnose and fix most of the problems we have seen to date. The game is worth watching just to see how far they have come. As for the Cardinal, they are better than Purdue but probably not as good as Louisville. In a perfect world, the Irish will start fast and never look back. Most likely, however, there will be a few anxious moments before the hosts are able to wear down the visitors and claim another victory.

NOTRE DAME 34  STANFORD 17

Tell John what you think in the Comments Section below

33 thoughts on “Rebuilding Stanford Visits Rested Irish

  1. Thanks for your hard work and this deep dive into Stanford, John. It’s painful to imagine what this Irish team might have been like without its pre-season and more recent injuries, or even if we still had the team that beat A&M at their place. The Irish need players fully recovered and ready to play, as the remainder of the season is one huge opportunity for our coaches to get young guys ready to face big time opponents. Before anything else, they need to punish Stanford, as I hope to enjoy watching ND’s talented receivers getting the chance to shine. Irish 41, Stanford 13.

  2. Stanford’s rush defense is ranked 12th in the nation, allowing 88 yards per game. The book has been written (and published) on the Irish offense. Stack the box, play the safeties up and dare Riley to throw. We will see what, if any, new wrinkles Denbrock has installed over the bye week. A lot will depend on our offensive line. But if Leonard struggles again throwing the ball, I see many drives ending 3 and out and our defense on the field all afternoon. Even an average offense can eventually score if given enough time. Irish 28-17

  3. Thank you for the preview John.

    5 games into the season teams like the Irish are what they are, and Leonard is what he is, a marginal passer. I expect the Cardinal to try to stuff the run with defensive alignments and see if Leonard can pass any better now than he has so far this season. That could mean some 3-and-outs, and the Irish D out there a little more than we’d like. It’s unlike the Irish to give up so many gash plays as they have- I hope they have fixed that problem but I fear only more playing experience will stop it. So, maybe one or two of those- hopefully they don’t hurt.

    I agree Stanford get around 17- and the Irish get 27. It won’t be too close but it may take until the 4th quarter before we relax.

  4. JVAN,

    We need “style points” this weekend!!

    Irish need to dominate a very average Stanford team if they truly are a playoff team..

    I watched the Stanford/Virginia Tech game last weekend and the Cardinal were thoroughly dominated!

    I expect nothing less from the Irish.

    ND 40
    Stanford 16

  5. While I love your analysis most of the time, I think you are over valuing a below average Stanford team. They rely on their TE ( a norm for past Stanford teams) with very little other options. I expect a solid performance by the Irish with limited success for Stanford. I’ll go with 35-10 Irish.

  6. William F. Murphy says:

    Stanford could have lost to a midget football team from Palo Alto and still manage to give us a fight to the finish.
    I watched their game against Syracuse, and they can surprise you. Otherwise, we should have a comfortable lead by the 4th (and maybe a more developed passing scheme), then give Steve Angeli some valuable snaps. Hopefully no more injuries, and we can prepare for a tough visit to Atlanta and G-Tech.

      • I think Texas is going to get stomped by Georgia because by then the Bulldogs will have had some weeks of Coach Smart’s frustration, dissatisfaction, and fury with how they’ve played, and will be at peak talent and incentive against the Longhorns.
        I also think Stanford is going to get stomped by the Fighting Irish. ND also will be at its apogee of incentive–and frustration–to play well. The talent will be fine-tuned tomorrow.

        • I hope you are right but I have doubts that ND’s offensive line can push around Stanford’s DL and linebackers. Stanford doesn’t have much talent overall but those are their strongest areas matched up against our weakest. We’ll see if Anthonie Knapp can block David Bailey.

  7. ED CHRISTOPHER ND '67 says:

    Stanford’s last four recruiting classes have been ranked 46, 27, 41 and 24. Their QB is their leading rusher with an
    injured leg. He can’t throw the deep pass. ND Defense will shut down Stanford.

    ND will rush for over 200 yards with Love the leading rusher. Stanford’s secondary is “weak”.
    Leornard will pass for three TD’s. Angeli will play all of the 4th quarter and pass to Eli for a TD in the 4th.

    ND 45 STANFORD 10

  8. I have radically changed my mind about Freeman. Going into this season I had strong doubts about his potential to be a successful ND head coach. Like everyone else at the beginning of his tenure, I was attracted to his likability and his integrity and the fact that he was not Brian Kelly, but when the inexplicable losses to mediocre teams began to mount up so did my doubts. Was he Bob Davies 2.0, the solid defensive coordinator who struggled with creating a productive offense? Then NIU happened and like everyone else I began to excavate his grave in the cemetery of unsuccessful ND coaches. But then something happened… his demeanor changed radically. Instead of being likable and eager to please, he became serious, testy, and intense. I think he came to the realization that the job demanded him to be more than just chief recruiter and head cheerleader. He needed to coach his ass off and do it toute suite. I think the turning point came when he reflected on Denbrock’s idiotic decision to throw a 30 yard pass on a second and one situation with a one point lead against an inferior NIU team late in the 4th quarter. At that point I think he realized he needed to reign Denbrock in and force him to create an offense that would function with a green offense line and an inconsistent passer. As a result we began seeing some multiple tight end formations, a renewed commitment to the running game, and a passing attack which would minimize Leonard’s shortcomings. It’s not a pretty offense but it got the job done in our last 3 games. All of this gives me hope for the future especially when you consider the very impressive young talent Freeman has amassed. In my opinion he now has a chance to succeed. Will it be this year? No. I expect at least a couple more losses. With our offensive limitations the schedule is not as easy at it once looked. But at least now I get the feeling Freeman is really in charge and dictating the game plans he feels will work. This week is a possible loss. As a northern Californian I have watched Stanford closely and they are no longer the train wreck they were last year. They have very good skill position players and a much improved O-line. And they have an excellent coach and creative play caller in Troy Taylor. I’m picking the Irish with a 24 to 21 victory, but as John Vannie would say…who knows?

  9. It remains perplexing the staff still sees Leonard as the only option. Is Minchey a total bust? When can we start easing Carr in? It seems the QB room has drastically improved since 2021 and yet the staff acts as if our depth is Pat Dillingham and David Wolke.

  10. Will,

    With all due respect, ND has really not amassed talent in the two most critical areas- QB and WR.

    Why do you think MF has to keep hitting the portal to fill these needs.

    I appreciate your optimistic view – but until we start amassing 5 star QB’s and WR’s, we’re no way near the elite of college football teams!!

    Just look at the WR position at Ohio St and the QB room at Texas…..

    We’re way behind…IMHO..

    • I would strongly disagree with you re. the qb room. Angelli, Minchey, and Carr are all excellent quarterbacks. In my opinion, Minchey may be the best fit for Denbrock’s system. In addition, Buchner provides even more depth and experience. But that’s not all…Noah Grubbs, an elite prospect from Florida, has committed to the ’26 class. The future is actually brighter than the present (Leonard) at quarterback. You may, however, have a point at wide receiver, but we really can’t be sure because Riley Leonard is not an elite passer. If you look at the roster we have plenty of young talent at wide-out. The problem is they are not being utilized because of Leonard’s limitations. We really don’t know how good these guys are, but…yes, I would agree that our wide receiver corps is the weakest link on the ND roster.

      • Will,

        Angelli is good but not great..

        Minchey and Carr are still TBD..

        Grubbs is verbally committed only — which means nothing…just look at our most recent decommitt….

        Believe me, MF will be in the portal again..

        • Jake, I agree with you. The lack of talent at QB and WR, plus not as fast others on D, are the main reasons never will never really compete for a Natty.

        • Jake, my point is that the q.b. room is in better shape now under Freeman than it ever was under Kelly…both in terms of quantity and quality. You are correct that Minchey and Carr are not yet proven but they were both highly touted out of high school. Angelli played excellently in the bowl game. My sense is that Freeman went to the portal because he felt Kelly left the cupboard bare. Should he have gone with Angelli, Minchey, or Carr this year rather than paying a million dollars to Leonard? Absolutely. The point is ND is not going to the playoffs this year with its O-line. So why not give the young guys a chance? The same goes for the wide outs. He made a mistake going to the portal for Collins, Harrison, and Mitchell. All 3 have been disappointments. Note to Marcus: play the talented kids you recruited out of high school. Don’t bring in transfer retreads who are in over their heads at ND.

    • Well said Jake. I too have been concerned about the lack of development of quality quarterbacks at ND and going into the portal to fill that need instead. I also believe this is why ND isn’t attracting great wide receivers. Until ND starts developing and USING some of the quarterbacks that she recruits to success, then great wide receivers will continue to look to schools that do. You can’t get NFL scouts to look at you when you’ve got someone like Riley Leonard (not) throwing the ball to you.

  11. So, the Irish … “have a veteran, well-compensated coaching staff.” John, you forgot to mention the veteran and well-compensated Quarterback!

    • Scott,

      I think I speak for many of the posters:

      You really need to start posting your prediction before the game and not Monday morning the board after the fact! It’s annoying to see you post after the outcome of the game!!

      I posted a 40-16 Irish victory! So Ha Ha to you..

  12. With the O-line still very much a work-in-progress, ND is left to depend upon a Josh Allen impersonator playing superman ball at QB, but without the ability to consistently hit on the passing game. The implication is that our highly compensated and experienced O.C. is unable to scheme a running game that can take advantage of our two very high quality running backs without our transfer loaner QB being the actual running game workhorse. This is an exercise in recurring frustration, that leaves fans to hope that somehow ND can cobble together a win-out regular season result so that we can get into this first edition of the 12-game CFBP, all in an effort to take advantage of a superior defense that will be riddled with departures for the 2025 season. This could have been avoided by playing the QBs on campus to start, perhaps, but then the O-line was still going to be the weak link . Meanwhile, every opponent knows that stopping our running game stops our offense completely. If we have zero ST errors, minimal penalties, 0-1 TOs at most, and zero coaching brain farts, we should win a close game, maybe 24-14; if not, we may well lose to an inferior team again. A blowout is near-inconceivable, unless Stanford really stinks it up with penalties and TOs. Thanks for all your hard work, John; glad to see you are sticking it out.

  13. This could be another ugly win. Despite it’s personnel shortcomings Stanford is still 2-2 which is a sign of good coaching. They got blown out at Clemson but it’s hard to play there and may have been more competitive against Va Tech if they had their starting QB.

    ND continues to play down to their competition and start slow out of the gate so that’s probably what we’ll see today.

  14. ♥️#501988🍀🏈💪 says:

    I will say THIS. From CNY and watched the Stanford and Cuse game. Stanford is A LOT BETTER than the scouting report. Athletic LBs, good WRs and QB can run and make your Defense look stupid! DON’T over look them and I agree with other posts, ND NEEDS to put a WHOOPING on them today!!!! NOTHING less than 50 on the 🌲 would be am embarrassment!!!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes:

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>