ADVERTISEMENT

Better Late Than Never

DJ McKinney scored on a pick-six to ignite a 28-3 second half blitz as Notre Dame defeated Wisconsin by 41-13 at Lambeau Field. Aneyas Williams ran for two scores and CJ Carr threw for two more as the Irish dominated after intermission. The Badgers played physical, inspired football before an equally divided crowd but could not keep pace throughout the evening.

Notre Dame took the second half kickoff nursing a 13-10 lead and finally started to roll. Williams capped a methodical scoring drive to give them breathing room at 20-10. Wisconsin tried to answer but disaster struck. Quarterback Colton Joseph overthrew a sideline pass and McKinney was off to the races in a convoy of teammates. His 55-yard score pushed the lead to 27-10 and the air went out of the Badger balloon. The Irish added a pair of long touchdown marches in the fourth quarter to ice the game. Meanwhile, the defense held the Badgers to a mere field goal.

The Irish were sluggish in the first half as the game settled into a defensive battle. Fans groaned when Notre Dame committed a false start on their first offensive play and failed to advance. Things got worse as the Badgers partially blocked the ensuing punt and turned it into three points. Notre Dame could not run the ball effectively and Carr’s passes often fell incomplete. The teams traded touchdowns a few minutes apart midway through the first half. Carr hit Wisconsin native James Flanigan with a short scoring toss and Joseph answered minutes later. His 28-yard pass to Malachi Coleman came on a beautifully executed play-action fake and double move. I wish Notre Dame would copy that and put it in its playbook.

A few additional observations:

  • The timing between the offensive linemen and running backs was out of synch in the first half. Williams was not patient in finding holes and simply surged into the line instead of reading his blocks. Both Williams and the linemen improved in this area after intermission.
  • Sullivan Absher made a positive difference at guard in both the run and pass game. His pass blocking enabled the running backs to get downfield and make catches for important gains. Kedren Young also looked healthy and strong.
  • Nolan James is a smooth and elusive runner who should get more opportunities as the season progresses.
  • Notre Dame’s tackling was excellent throughout the game. Adon Shuler was a monster on the back end. The secondary and linebackers prevented Joseph’s dink and dunk passes from becoming bigger plays.
  • Carr was more disciplined in the pocket but still threw a couple of near interceptions in the flat.
  • The defensive line was disciplined in maintaining its rush lanes and preventing long scrambles by Joseph.
  • Leonard Moore proved he could tackle as well as shut down passes thrown his way.
  • The aggressive Irish corners love to jump sideline routes but were victimized twice by double moves.
  • On kickoff returns, I would rather see one of the faster freshman backs win the job. Williams is fearless but he is not a threat to break one.
  • Several guys played well besides Shuler, Moore, Absher, McKinney, Faison, and James. I noted Bryce Young, Francis Brewu, Tionne Gray, and all the linebackers and tight ends.

Let’s review the answers to our pregame questions:

  • Will Notre Dame contain Joseph and force him into mistakes? Joseph got the ball out quickly to the short zones, with limited success. His scrambling ability did not hurt the Irish and move the chains. His one big mistake turned into a Notre Dame touchdown.
  • Which new Irish playmakers emerge at tailback and receiver? Other than James, I was disappointed in the non-usage of Greathouse and Graham. Carr utilized the tight ends more effectively though.
  • Will Carr demonstrate improved decision-making and passing accuracy? Carr managed the game well and generally used good judgment. His accuracy was fair to good. There is still room for improvement.
  • Which team will maintain an effective balance on offense? Wisconsin had slightly better balance in the first half but Notre Dame had a great second half.
  • Will the Irish special teams make a statement? They made several but not all were positive. The blocked punt and kickoff out of bounds were inexcusable. On the other hand, it is nice to see a 52-yard field goal sail through the uprights.
  • Can Notre Dame’s deep defensive line live up to its lofty expectations? They clogged up the running lanes for the most part and let the linebackers make tackles. Fans wanted more sacks but Joseph’s running ability and quick passes dictated a different approach. Note that the sacks came at the end of the game when the running threat disappeared. Thirteen points allowed with only one explosive play speaks for itself.
  • Will Notre Dame’s secondary catch more passes than the Badger receivers? No, but those units had the same number of touchdown receptions.
  • Can the Irish demonstrate competency with the Lambeau Leap? Shuler led the charge into the student section with Drayk Bowen and others right behind him.

Notre Dame’s victory in this special environment should take the edge off future performances. There were obvious nerves at first but the coaches ensured that no one panicked. I will be interested to see how the offense evolves toward reaching its potential. The Irish have several potential playmakers that should gain confidence as the next few weeks unfold. Carr’s experience and leadership are important factors in making this happen. With this opening act behind them after nine months, I imagine they cannot wait until Saturday to play again.

ADVERTISEMENT

34 thoughts on “Better Late Than Never”

  1. The first half went exactly as I predicted…a defensive struggle. Fortunately, ND woke up in the second half and took control. The insertion of Sullivan Absher at right tackle made all the difference. He’ll start next week. If there was anything surprising to me it was the pass receiving prowess of Nolan James. What didn’t surprise me is the the lack of prowess by all Irish wide receivers not named Faison. All in all this was a very valuable first game against an opponent who will have a strong Big 10 season. John, how concerned should we be about the lack of production from our 2 thru 6 wide receivers?

    • It’s hard for receivers 2-5 to make plays if Carr doesn’t even look at them. He is much more comfortable throwing to Faison. Carr did do a good job of hitting his running backs in check downs. James looked great in the open field. Micah Gilbert also made a nice catch.

  2. ND fan in the South says:

    Second half was more like I expected us to play. We wore down the WI defense and CJ got more time to pick his spots. MF admitted the team had a lot to work on. Glad to see us win by an impressive score

  3. Opening game against a decent opponent in an away location. The Irish overcame some first-game jitters, shook off some mistakes and ultimately asserted themselves. We shouldn’t complain, I this team is gonna get hot. Looking forward to some Irish dominance like the old days!

  4. After the first half I thought ND was going to lay yet another early season egg. ND woke up in the second half but 41-13 victory still felt closer than the final score. Credit Wisconsin for playing inspired ball but they shot their wad in the first half.

    It seems Carr stares down Faison. Unless ND can get more production from the other receivers they will not make it that far in the playoffs. The better defenses will easily be able to take Faison out of the game.

    There is obviously a huge dropoff in running back production but some of this is due to offensive line struggles. But Love and Price are irreplaceable and they spoiled us the last two years with their ability to rip off long runs and their breakaway speed which the current RB room seems to lack.

  5. Great to see the team wear down the opponent in the 2H, nice win to start the year. Does anybody else think the NBC announcers stink? They seem to root for calls against ND.

    Go Irish!

    • I didn’t see that. They seemed pretty impartial. The were very much, and correctly, against a holding call on the Irish– as an example.

    • Jerry Kennell says:

      I totally agreee, I spent more time yelling at the announcers than the Irish. Jason Garret was terrible , I can see why he no longer coaches the Cowboys. Mid way through the third period he was still saying Wisconsin was outplaying the Irish. I expected a tough game Finkel is a very good coach and had his team prepared. We just have more talent..

      • My generous interpretation is that Garrett was trying to make the game seem more interesting than it was so people would not switch channels. The Louisville-Ole Miss game was more competitive.

        My realistic interpretation is that Garrett is a freaking idiot. Since I was at the game I didn’t have to listen to him.

        • Anybody who dislikes the announcers, and chooses not to turn the audio off, should be barred from commenting here about disliking the announcers. Sheeesh.

    • Chris Amenson says:

      I fully concur. The announcers seemed to be much more critical of Notre Dame and didn’t catch that momentum had changed drastically in the second half. I am very disappointed in NBC choice of telecasters. Dallas former QB was by far the worse of the two.

      Yank em, NBC. Yank em!

  6. First Half: Very disappointing. Second Half: Significant improvement. Overall, a decent first-game win over a somewhat decent first-game opponent. There is upside potential to this team with solid coaching and proper motivation. One game at a time. We shall see.

  7. ND made some solid open-field tackles, certain blown coverages notwithstanding. I’ll take that as an improvement over Irish D displays in the early stages of multiple seasons past. Go Irish 🍀

  8. At half-time, I thought my 24-10 prediction might hold true. I’m glad it didn’t. The prediction of the running game being dragged [with losing Love and Price] was true, however. Williams is a momentum guy– if momentum is good, he does okay. That doesn’t bode well. We can’t wait around for him to “activate”. He doesn’t really bounce to the outside when there is opportunity. But he is a talented athlete; no doubt.

    Just a few final lazy observations:

    * When are we going to use Greathouse? — He’s absolutely elite.
    * Was the offensive line’s shakiness was just nerves, or poor preparedness? I’ll say the former for now.
    * Anyone else continually impressed with Freeman’s (and Denbrock’s) ability to assess and adjust the team?
    * Carr is awesome. But, is he missing opportunities to spread the ball around?

    • One catch for 6 yards doesn’t seem elite. Not sure if anything is going on with him, but at some point we will need to throw the ball down field and open holes for the running backs.

  9. 1st half – Carr looked like a HS qb. He stared down his primary receiver, no progressions.

    2nd half- Carr mostly went thru his progressions, hit running backs with passes.

    Carr is a bit overrated and needs much improvement if ND is to reach the promised land!

  10. Carr rarely moves the pocket. Is he told not to. Wish he would roll out more and why do we not show hardly any RPO’s? As usual your analysis is spot on John.

    • The coaches don’t want to expose Carr to unnecessary hits and he is more comfortable in the pocket anyway. He will stay there as long as the protection holds up.

  11. JV,
    Thank you for the pre- and post- game analysis.
    The importance of winning the beauty pageant narrative has never been more important in this conference-entitled, NIL-juiced, instagram-stat, NCAA-LSU-swamp of a sport.
    ND looked really good and the prospects for the regular season are bright. What a fantastic performance by the defense — really.
    My biggest concerns going forward are 1) the complacency that will set in with the tomato can matchups to come 2) the trade off with CJ. Carr; is he here to improve his stat line for the Heisman or do we want the championship — there is a risk of injury in garbage time and I would like to keep/develop Noah Grubbs 3) creative ACC officials.
    Go Irish beat Owls.

  12. Great win to start the 2026 season! I was happy to see that the offensive and defensive lines were much better in the 2nd half. The running game picked up a bit as the game went along and it was nice to get a couple sacks as well.
    Wisconsin it not a bad team and they could be a 8 win team. Therefore, in my mind this is a quality win for the Irish! Go ND BEAT Rice!!!!

  13. “On kickoff returns, I would rather see one of the faster freshman backs win the job.”

    . . . and in the future, you may. Probably, the thinking now is to have someone who will be most certain of catching the ball and securing it.

  14. I wonder how much of the September struggles ND has had in recent years are due to making the wrong evaluations in training camp. 3 of the best players on the field, Absher, Tionne Gray and Brewu, were not starters. We heard all about how good the o-line was and how Onye and Mukam were great in practice. Credit to Freeman and the staff for making those changes quickly and not waiting a month. I’m hoping those 3 start going forward, but also hoping some non-starter playmakers get a chance to show they can take it up a level in hot game situations. I’m understand leaning on Aneyas WIlliams and Jordan Faison in game 1 for experience. But those freshman running backs need a shot to run with the starting o-line (I agree not having them on ST at least is a missed opportunity). And there’s also a talented receiver group that either isn’t getting on the field or isn’t getting the ball thrown their direction. I read that Carr locks onto Faison and his tight ends and I don’t know if that was true.

  15. JVAN,

    As many have noted, the first half was a complete disappointment. It looked like the same playbook from the Miami game last year.

    ND needs to open up the playbook and let Carr throw the ball down the field. Very disappointed they did not
    involve the very talented WR room. If you have a Heisman candidate, then let him act like one!! And where is
    Cam Williams?

    It felt like in the first half that they were playing not to lose – way too conservative. They definitely left doubt in the first 30 minutes.

    As Dave said earlier, I think they started the wrong 2 DT. I’m glad they figured that out quickly and I expect to see a new depth chart soon.

    Anyhow, I’m glad they time to figure all of this out before BYU, MIAMI SMU.

  16. Very interesting season ahead for not only Freeman and the team, but also alumni and fan base around the country. Expectations are through the roof, but the team has real are flaws including what seems to be a less than completely dominant OL and skill players that are not quite top 10 type of team elite. Also fans are going to have to come to terms with how spoiled they’ve been watching Love and Price. All things considered, a 28 point win against an upper middle Big10 opponent is a very solid. Rice should be a cake walk but than, another rising Big10 team comes to town who will be physical and well coached. The schedule isn’t as easy as the ND hating media would like everyone to believe.

  17. Thanks for your hard work before and after the game, John! I feel grateful you are back for another season, new eligibility rules be damned. It seems college football will now be run by local judges in college towns rather than the NCAA. Is that better?!

    • It’s definitely not better but it’s what we have now. Let’s keep our focus on the actual games. At least Notre Dame is not involved in any of these controversies. Best to leave that to the SEC and cheaters like Michigan.

  18. Not surprised by the first half. This seems to be a common occurrence. I thought Wisconsin would be a tougher game than the “experts” predicted. Michigan State will be a tougher opponent too. In my view, our schedule will prove to be at the end of the season a much tougher one than the schedules of many of the favorites predicted to win the title (e.g. Indiana, Miami, Georgia, etc. with their joke out-of-conference opponents).
    This team has great potential if it continues to play the way it did in the 2nd half against Wisconsin. Kickoffs and punts now seem to be a problem. Extra points and field goals seem to be in good hands.
    I agree with the comments that sometimes the wrong players are the starters and their replacements prove to be better. Not uncommon – see a 3rd stringer named Joe Montana. At least the coaches seem open to making changes without the necessity of the starter being injured.

  19. J. V. the absence of you summation of the pre-game predictions in the beginning of the week made me realize just how much I look forward to your analysis each week. Truthfully, the first had me worried. I thought Wisconsin did an excellent job of developing a game plan to counter our strengths. Talent tilted the outcome in the end. I mentioned last week how hard the transfer portal made predicting opening games. Overall, I think CJ ran a better than average offence. Like Freeman said CJ took what the offence gave him and did not put the ball at risk, in my opinion, at times his style reminded me Tom Brady. I would be happy to see that throughout the season. Sullivan Absher and Adon Shuler were game changers. When you standout with players like Moore and Fasion and the rest of this very talented team, that is saying something. Thanks for doing this each week, much appreciated.

    • I thought the defense would carry ND in the opener, and they did. Wisconsin was difficult to gauge because of the transfers. In the end, each team scored three more points than I predicted but that’s not bad.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes:

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>