The improbability of that is astounding.
by tdiddy07 (2018-01-18 12:02:03)
Edited on 2018-01-18 12:07:21

In reply to: Star ratings are useless once the players get to college  posted by Jvan


It would be highly improbably that ND's recruits are generally overrated because of ND's offer, and other programs with bigger brand names right now (Alabama or Ohio State) are not overrated because of their offers. Both programs generally outperform their recruiting rankings.

It would be even more improbable that ND always lands the highest ranking players who aren't actually that good, and everyone else who offers those players doesn't have those players commit to their programs AND the guys who do commit actually are as good as their rankings.

Wimbush had Alabama and Ohio State offers. Mack (nee Jones) had USC, Auburn, Georgia offers.

In no world are ND's recruits "almost always overrated by the services." Like any program, the rankings are inexact and sometimes less heralded players outperform the more heralded ones. But by and large the best players that develop the best tend to be the higher ranked ones.

And ND is developing NFL talent at about the same pace as their recruiting rankings would suggest. What they aren't doing, however, is winning at that same pace with that talent. And at certain positions there have been consistent developmental failures linked to Kelly's control of quarterbacks and BVG's linebacker and safety play.

Mack had Scott Booker coaching him, maybe the biggest lightweight on Kelly's staff. In the past three years, ND had the worst TE development production it has had in over a decade. No one has looked like a pro since Koyack left. But Koyack and Eifert weren't overrated because of their ND offers. And Koyack was a little higher rated than Smythe and Mack with a little better list of offers. But ND also didn't have 5-star Rudolph during that stretch or Koyack. And the guys who outperformed that group was a wildly underrated Eifert, a wildly underrated Carlson. Even Niklas was ranked lower than Mack/Smyth with a worse offer list. Like Carlson and Eifert, Niklas wasn't overrated by the services.

Just like under Faust, ND isn't failing to develop successful players because their recruits are overrated. It's failing to develop players where there is poor coaching. And its recruiting ratings versus production (as measured by NFL grades and drafts) do not show any general disparity between how the services rank ND's recruits versus any other program.


You are exactly correct
by WilfordBrimley  (2018-01-19 22:31:37)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post

and, in particular, the correlation between our recruiting rankings (typically between 8 and 11) and our NFL draft production (between 8 and 11 over the course of the Kelly era) is almost exactly the same. The R-squared between programs with top tier recruiting and programs with top tier NFL draft and on field production has to be very high.

The fact that we can’t compete with OU and Clemson (who are also in our range in both stats) on the field is a culture and coaching problem, not a talent problem. And they also have kids transfer, lose kids for whatever reasons, etc.

A great recruiter like Urban Meyer would be able to consistently pull in top 4 - 5 classes every year at ND, but we’ll never repeat what Alabama just did.

Furthermore, the ND fans aren’t powerful enough in the market for this stuff to move rankings on individual players and haven’t been for at least a decade. OSU, Michigan, LSU, Alabama, SC, Texas, UGA fans and so forth are all just as voracious consumers of that recruiting stuff as ND fans are.


Completely agree...
by dulacshakur  (2018-01-18 17:12:32)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post

The bottom line is ND nearly always underperforms relative to its recruiting rankings, and good programs do not. The most likely explanations are institutional softness and poor coaching, not over-ranking by recruiting services (which would gain little by pumping up ND's classes).

As mentioned by others, the academic/self-selection angle/excuse is largely debunked by Stanford's extended period of success, and making matters worse, our recruiting performance has slowly but surely deteriorated since the Weis days.

We have become a shittier version of Stanford with a far more delusional fan base under the stewardship of our megalomaniacal and mercenary leadership.


“Wimbush had Alabama and OSU offers”
by ACross  (2018-01-18 13:23:05)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post

That’s not so accurate. Our top recruit, Barnett, gave us the bird for Alabama. It’s not like Alabama was going to sign Wimbush instead of or in addition to Barnett. Almost certainly, they, like ND, evaluated Barnett more highly than Wimbush.

I do not recall what QB Ohio State was recruiting or where Wimbush stood on their pecking order.

I don’t think “offer lists”are as probation as they once were, because I think schools extend more and emptier “offers” and I think kids also exaggerate with the proliferation of recruiting service harassment.


Not sure about Bama, but OSU certainly coveted Wimbush
by YinzKeenanVisor  (2018-01-18 14:59:50)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post

who, you may recall, first committed to PSU.

His recruitment was well covered by Ohio State beat writers at the time (see the link at bottom), as was his flip to Notre Dame in the fall of 2014.

Their interest wasn't unreasonable. He'd be a good fit in Urban Meyer's system.


coveted Wimbush
by skanman  (2018-01-18 15:30:01)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post

It was obvious to me that Wimbush was not the best choice for ND quarterback, after watching last year's spring game. Book is a better choice. Perhaps Wimbush's development is on Kelly. He is a great athlete who would make an excellent running back, wide receiver, or H back. I hope he stays!
It is Kelly's job to use the talent he has wisely.