I think you understate Swarbrick's involvement

I think you understate Swarbrick's involvement
by ACross (2018-12-11 09:55:51)
Edited on 2018-12-11 10:00:51

In reply to: Although the report was Nassar-focused, it’s clear USAG posted by Bruno95

He was not merely "one of USAG's lawyers." He was, until he took the ND job, USAG's outside general counsel. It is almost certain that USAG was his client, that he was the originator and the relationship lawyer and the responsible and supervising lawyer at the firm for the client. He was outside general counsel for USAG for many years and held that role, it appears, at a time when USAG adopted, with the advice out its outside counsel of its no report policy. USAG should waive privilege.

Replies:

I did not say he was merely one of their lawyers. - Bruno95 2018-12-11 10:06:39
- I was reacting to this excerpt from your post - ACross 2018-12-11 10:16:49
  - Understood. - Bruno95 2018-12-11 10:30:19
    - A question, if you please. I'd like to believe due diligence - KevinPS 2018-12-12 08:25:52
      - I’d include Corr in the discussions. - Bruno95 2018-12-12 09:36:00
        Thank you. * - KevinPS 2018-12-12 12:41:54
    - Who was the USAG representative who specifically laid blame - ACross 2018-12-11 11:06:02
      - In this article, two former presidents -- one was Penny. (link) - Bruno95 2018-12-11 11:08:05
        Interesting comment on that article. And spot on. - Otter 2018-12-12 10:22:46
I’ve been waiting for an advice-of-counsel defense from USAG - 1NDGal 2018-12-11 10:03:19
- It starts like this. - SWPaDem 2018-12-11 16:36:53