In reply to: Required reading posted by ACross
...oh, it’s the name of a person on the transcript.
Carry on.
Or do you think he needed to do a better job of handling bullshit objections?
I think he should have just terminated the deposition.
Savvy out of the room.
when a judge is to be called. Doesn't really matter. Make a record, call the judge, just don't take a useless deposition. The lawyer may well have been just making a record that the lawyer and the witness were not cooperating. He may have had other fish to fry, he may have had a strategy.
I have no idea what he was doing in response to the objections beyond floundering. Moreover, if the listing of counsel at the outset is accurate, it appears that two lawyers are representing the same co-defendant clients. If so, why are they being allowed to tag team on objections?
Still not really sure what it all means after reading that twice.