It’s the same offense. Two teams can run the same

Good holy grief *

When the 'emphasis' is more than game-to-game...

...then it isn't the same offense.

If it were the same offense, then Swinney, overall, would put as much responsibility on his QB that Kelly does. He does not, so it is not.

I think you need to define your definition of offense. Base

scheme is how it’s usually defined. We have the same base scheme as Clemson.

All enlightenment starts with a definition of terms.

Do you mean that both teams utilize the shotgun?

What makes you think that they have the same base offense besides that both teams run most of their plays with the QB in shotgun?

How do you define the "base scheme" in question? *

I must be misunderstanding you.

Is your position that all spread offenses are the same?

what a load of utter crap *

You are good, you *

Kelly's offense is a unique, mutant, ugly beast

His system's design and approach is not the same as any other design and approach

Can you eschew the Trumpian ine-liners and tell us how

Specifically?

This will be like Donald explaining the circles of healthcare.

We need more fullbacks and student body right.

How cool was it when Shaw got stuffed for the 100th time in a row on 4th and 1 but used 7 offensive lineman? His offense ranked 123rd in the country, but his kids play tough, power football like we used to under Holtz.

Or that time Harbaugh lined up in a 10-man I-formation? Manball. BK could take a page out of Jim's book, right?

Great point, smithwick!

The two of you together - a real brain trust. 10 total watts.

So Trumpian, its scary. I await a little marco reference *

Ha you're such a dork. *

whereas you hip hop dance at the Linebacker *

It's a matter of developed record discussed for about 9 year

You can make believe the discussions never happened, or that the games and seasons were never played, or watched, or dissected, and that the aroma has wafted away. We know the differences between the offenses.

Thats actually a worse answer than the circles. Embarrassing

Begging of the question. Whom does this work on?

Across has been right about Kelly's offense from Day 1.

Whereas you have been wildly inconsistent, and claiming you're right while simultaneously changing your mind on everything. I'd understand if you had a jt level of knowledge of the game, but you are wrong about nearly everything when you make predictions.

That swings both ways. People also said we would be lucky

to win 8 games the last two years

And those people would be right *

Good grief *

Clemson has 5-star players. Notre Dame doesn't. *

The frosh WR that killed us (and 'Bama) was a 4*. *

A 5* is defined as someone ready to play and star as a

freshman.

He's a 5-star.

Several Clemson offensive players are 5-star... *

Lawrence, most notably.

I'm just saying that 4-stars can perform too if they're coached well.

I would love a couple of Top 50 backs/wideouts.....

That seems out of our reach with The 3-Star General.

And a 5-star coach. *