How have Meyer assistants fared as head coaches?
by drinkycrow (2019-12-05 08:17:56)

Does he have a tree?


shouldn't it be the Bob Davie tree? *
by irishrock  (2019-12-05 09:13:37)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post


Fairly well
by nohow  (2019-12-05 08:25:51)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post

Strong, Mullen, and Whittingham have the strongest ties.


I don't know how one measures ties to a tree
by fontoknow  (2019-12-05 09:07:34)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post

But I'd say Gary Andersen has stronger ties than Charlie Strong.

I don't think his tree is all that impressive, though Ryan Day is definitely performing well in his initial season as a head coach.


Andersen only coached under him for a year.
by tdiddy07  (2019-12-05 09:25:12)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post

Where Meyer brought him back to Utah, where he was an assistant pre-Meyer, after a failed head coaching stint at Southern Utah.


Strong is closer to Whittingham. Like Whittingham, Strong was the DC when Meyer was hired, and he kept him on. Only Meyer had a previous history with Strong at ND, as well as other Holtz/Davie connections. Both of them have stronger connections than Andersen, who also was essentially inherited but only but given a reduced role than what he had before (no ST or AHC title). Also, it's easier to keep on a position coach. There's greater responsibility on the coordinators, so there is likely greater evaluation going on from the head coach in deciding to keep a coordinator of a failed regime--which he did with Strong and Whittingham.

Mullen has the strongest ties as someone who grew up under Meyer. Guys who got their break under Meyer seem strongest. That would include Day and Herman.