Sam Hartman threw four touchdown passes in a nealy flawless debut as Notre Dame raced to a 28-0 halftime lead and coasted to a 42-3 victory over Navy. The Fighting Irish scored touchdowns on their first five possessions and did not have to punt during this lopsided contest. Defensively, Notre Dame gave up ground in the early going but managed to keep the Midshipmen off the scoreboard. Later, the huge deficit forced Navy out of its offensive comfort zone and the Irish dominated.
Freshman receiver Jaden Greathouse caught two scoring passes from Hartman while Deion Colzie and Jayden Thomas had one apiece. Hartman finished his day with 19 completions on 23 passes for 251 yards. Notre Dame utilized five running backs to cover 191 yards in 32 attempts. Audric Estime had 95 yards and a touchdown on 16 carries while Jadarian Price scored on a 19-yard burst. The Midshipmen could muster only 169 total yards.
The Irish started quickly with a crisp 13-play touchdown march on the opening possession. Estime did the heavy lifting while Hartman mixed in a few pinpoint throws. Navy nearly responded on the ensuing possession with a productive drive but a fourth down pass by Tai Lavatai in Irish territory missed its mark. From that point forward, Notre Dame continued to score while the Middies found it increasingly difficult to gain ground.
Trailing 21-0 in the second period, Navy finally threatened to get back in the game. They covered over 50 yards on the ground in grinding fashion and reached the Irish 19 yard-line before the drive stalled. Coach Brian Newberry elected to call upon kicker Evan Warren for a 37-yard field goal but the attempt was wide right. Two minutes remained in the half and Hartman went back to work. He hit Chris Tyree and Greathouse with passes before finding Thomas in the back of the end zone with 13 seconds left.
Any hopes of another second half comeback were dispelled in the opening minutes of the third quarter. The Midshipmen meekly went three and out to give the ball back to Notre Dame. A few plays later, Hartman avoided the rush and threw a dart to a wide-open Greathouse in the end zone from 20 yards out for a comanding 35-0 advantage.
The Irish defense continued to smother Navy’s attack. A missed field goal by Spenser Schrader was the only blemish on the offensive stat sheet. As the game moved into the fourth quarter, Hartman directed his final scoring drive of the day. Runs by Price and Jeremiah Love moved the ball into scoring territory before Hartman hit Deion Colzie in the flat. Colzie weaved his way through Navy defenders and breezed into the end zone to extend the lead to 42-0.
The Midshipmen were able to make headway against the Notre Dame reserves on their final drive but fell short of the end zone. Newberry eschewed another fourth down pass and again called upon Warren to put points on the board. His 31-yard boot was successful to account for the final margin.
Notre Dame’s performance answered a few questions regarding this year’s team while others remain TBD. First, Hartman is everything Irish fans had hoped for. He was cool under pressure, accurate and made good decisions. His receivers other than Thomas were on the hot seat entering the game but exceeded expectations. Colzie was focused, Tyree flashed good hands with his trademark speed, and Greathouse picked up where he left off this spring. Tobias Merriweather was the only disappointment. He had no receptions and one very blatant drop.
The offensive line was very strong. There were no false starts or missed blitzes. They dominated Navy’s defensive line as one would expect with their size advantage, so additional games will be needed to gauge their ceiling. The backs ran well and contributed in the passing game. Each of them hit the hole without dancing and punished would-be tacklers. The tight ends did not have a reception and Mitchell Evans picked up the only Notre Dame penalty of the day with an early holding call. This group will be more involved and productive going forward.
Defensively, linebacker Marist Liufau was the most improved player for the Irish. It appears his football instincts are finally catching up with his outstanding physical gifts. Jack Kiser and JD Bertrand looked to be the same players they have always been. Both are good tacklers but lack the speed and playmaking ability that elite teams expect from their linebackers. Neither had a tackle for loss. The front line was solid against the triple option attack but more revealing tests lie ahead.
The cornerbacks could not be evaluated because Navy did not throw enough downfield passes to notice them. The safeties, however, remain unsafe. DJ Brown whiffed on an easy open-field tackle, Thomas Harper was hopelessly beaten on a long pass that was quite fortunately overthrown, and Clarence Lewis was again missing tackles and a step late on every play. Ramon Henderson was simply invisible. Only Xavier Watts demonstrated a nose for the ball and good tackling ability.
Let’s review the answers to our pregame questions:
- Can the Irish defense make stops at or behind the line of scrimmage? There weren’t many “Wow” plays but the defense made key stops when needed to keep Navy out of the end zone.
- Will Hartman and his wide receivers be connected or hopelessly disjointed? Hard work and dedication over the spring and summer were obvious. The passing game is far ahead of 2022 when Michael Mayer was the only sure thing.
- Can Notre Dame’s offensive line handle Navy’s run blitzes? The line executed well and there were no mental breakdowns with the blocking scheme.
- Which team will win the turnover battle? There were officially no turnovers but both teams had bad moments. Estime had the ball punched out of his hands but Evans was able to knock it out of bounds. Hartman overlooked a defender downfield and nearly threw an interception. Navy had two fumbles that the Irish recovered but the referees chose not to acknowledge them.
- Can Notre Dame’s special teams contribute in a meaningful way? The units were solid but the missed field goal by Schrader will carry doubt into the next game. Punter Bryce McFerson took the day off.
- Have the Irish back seven defenders learned how to tackle? Not to my satisfaction.
- Can Gerad Parker keep the Middies off balance with inspired play calling? Parker was excellent. His call for a run by Estime on an early third and long was inspired. He mixed his plays very well and the team responded by executing in a decisive manner. It was refreshing after the Kelly era where confusion often reigned and purple faced rants followed.
- Which young players will distinguish themselves for Notre Dame? Greathouse, Love, GiBran Payne, and Price served notice that they will help the offense this year. The young guys on defense did not get very man snaps but I was briefly impressed by Josh Burnham and Jaden Mickey.
With the opener out of the way and the triple option in the rear view mirror, the team can look forward to an easy home game next week before going on the road. There are still areas of concern but Hartman alone gives Notre Dame fans a level of hope and expectation that they haven’t enjoyed in quite a while.
David Opie says:
Notre Dame has a better quarterback than Alabama does.
Kevin McNamara says:
For one year anyway
irishhawk50 says:
I am glad the Navy game is over. I have said in the past that if they are scheduling Navy (triple option), it should be the first game of the season to give ND the proper time to prepare. This game was almost embarrassing. I know the whole story of WW2 and Navy but I think it is time to end this, Maybe the Irish can rotate the Service Academies,
Hartman is clearly all he was advertised to be and the defense played well enough. I will give the back end a Mulligan for not being anywhere near in coverage since they didn’t prepare for a passing game, but still no excuse. They looked lost.
I don’t think we will learn anything much from playing Tennessee State (join the Big 10, if this and MAC are why ND needs independence. Rather see Indiana and Illinois!). NC State on the road might be of interest.
Mike says:
Merriweather plays like he believes h doesn’t need to make extra effort. But he does need to, given how he looked on both targets today. Admittedly a great play by the defensive back on the long pass, but Merriweather didn’t extend his arms and hands at all to go for the ball.
Chris says:
ND needs to get Merriweather some catches vs a very over-matched Tennessee St team next weekend if only to help his confidence. We are going to need him vs the “big 3” later this season.
Also, while it was just the first game of the season, tackling HAS to improve especially by certain members of the secondary.
That said, I’m ecstatic Hartman looks to be the real deal, Estime is a battering ram (fumbling issues still need to be resolved) & how cool was it to see Jadarian Price score a TD on his 1st collegiate carry & Jaden Greathouse do the same on his 1st collegiate catch?
The kicker handling kickoffs (Schrader?) did a fantastic job as well w/ all but 1 kick being touchbacks.
VegasPoker74 says:
Merriweather might learn more from being benched.
Scott says:
Merriweather is a HUGE disappointment…PERIOD! His play yesterday proves it.
Mike says:
Merriweather plays like he believes he doesn’t need to make extra effort. But he does need to, given how he looked on both targets today. Admittedly a great play by the defensive back on the long pass, but Merriweather didn’t extend his arms and hands at all to go for the ball.
Will says:
Vannie, good post game analysis. Marcus Freeman is maturing as a head coach. That is encouraging. Speaking of head coaches, I wonder if Navy is beginning to miss Ken Niumatololo. I still don’t understand why they fired him. As far as ND is concerned Hartman brings a level of quality and efficiency to the qb position that was lacking under BK. A question for you, Vannie: based on this performance and the spring game performance what Irish quarterback since Huarte does Sam most remind you of. It’s a very small sample size but to me I see a bit of Joe Cool in him. How about you?
John Vannie says:
The Montana comparison isn’t perfect but I can’t think of any other ND QB in my lifetime whom he resembles more in terms of style, accuracy and mobility. He doesn’t look anything like Joe, however. Maybe if a young Fred Couples had a full beard…..
Jake in Cali says:
JVAN,
The Hartman Heisman Campaign is on!!
Great performance by him spreading the ball all over the field..
Alot more to come..
Ventura Pop Pop says:
I guess I’m just a loyal guy, but I miss Drew Pyne. He would have won this game too.
mike says:
SH and ND are in what was initially a transactional relationship; ND got an experienced QB, to play and mentor the young pups, and SH got an opportunity to play in a system with a pro-style approach, while also testing himself in the glare of intense national exposure, neither available at WF, allowing him to both prepare for and interview for the NFL in hopes of improving his chances/draft status. The surprise has been how quickly he came to “get it,” and fit in with the team, becoming a true leader and in fact even voted 1 of 4 team captains by his teammates. While I agree with your sentiment approach-wise, this is one unique situation it appears.
VegasPoker74 says:
Take a look at the massive spare tire Pyne sported in last year’s spring game – a prime example of his lack of leadership and inability to set a good example for his teammates. That should cure your misplaced affections.
Scott says:
Like he barely won last season? How about the Stanford game, the USC game?? No way he wins this game 42-3. Pyne is where he belongs – not in an ND uniform. Move on and embrace the guy who is there now.
Edconn says:
Hartland accuracy FAR exceeds Joe’s.
John Vannie says:
Joe improved exponentially with age. Remember that Hartman is already 30 years old.
Mike says:
In the NFL Joe was known for putting the ball EXACTLY where it should be for his receivers to do their best with it. If there is a specific legacy besides leadership and winning attributed to him, that is one. His 49er teammates loved him for it.
a68domer says:
BTW, Great interview with Joe Cool during the game!
joe says:
Good summary of the game John! I was impressed with Hartman, the running game, and the defense only giving up 3 points!!!! I wished they would play Navy in the 1st game of the season every year!! GO IRISH BEAT TENN STATE!!
craig brenton says:
Offense will continue to evolve positively and improve. Tobias needs more work and I hope he can start using his great talent. ND needs him to win the big ones.
Defensive Backfield needs work in both coverage and tackling – appears to be a possible achilles heel.
More speed at Linebacker may be needed in future to complete w/ Clemson, USC, OSU. However, LB’s are hard workers, smart and competent.
W/ Hartman a major upgrade at the most important position, I’m upgrading my prediction to 10-2 from 9-3.
Should be a very good year for ND football.
ND fan in the South says:
Love the outcome of this game and the great start for Hartmann and the team. I only worry that the hairy guy can keep his head on straight. After one game, he is now the media darling and an instant Heisman candidate. No one knew him at Wake Forest where he set so many records. Now he is at ND as star QB. Hopefully, his maturity will help him through the media blitz, which undoubtedly will turn on him with his first interception.
D. Gremillon says:
A close shave would be welcome for all.
JCarrol says:
My sentiments Exactly! – You read my mind. Makes him look way to fluffy or unkempt; aka below ND standards.
Timothy Miller says:
Hartman was great. I will root for him and the Irish. But I just don’t like rentals. I like the NFL but one is enough.
GOND88 says:
ND took care of business and they should have. There was no let down although there are clearly things they need to work on and improve. It was just the first game and against Navy but I was very impressed with Gerad Parker’s game plan, the play calling and execution. It was a very balanced attack and it appears Parker may have simplified the offense a bit as there seemed to be less confusion and busted plays than normal. I also like that the QB doesn’t seem to always be looking to the sideline for instructions.
ND hasn’t had a QB with pin point passing capability since I guess Brady Quinn and Jimmy Clausen.
The defense was solid but not dominant against Navy’s rushing attack. Overall a good win and something to build on but the first real test won’t come until the travel to N. Carolina and then when tOSU comes to town two weeks later.
#❤️☘️50 says:
ND should have had their way with Navy. Should have their way next week and the the NC STATE game will be a good test early but ☘️ should prevail in the end! The lines both sides of the ball need to continue to get better each and every week. Miscues (fumbles and almost int) need to nonexistent moving Forward. Looks like we have the pieces but only time will tell. It’s always great to start the season with a win but need to stay focused and keep improving!!!!
Scott says:
“Navy had two fumbles that the Irish recovered but the referees chose not to acknowledge them.”
I totally agree. Especially Bertrand’s recovery. How any official could look at that and decide that Lavatai had it is beyond me. There is no way Lavatai had that ball. But, I can’t complain because Navy’s drive sputtered on the next play.
D. Gremillon says:
I truly enjoyed viewing this win while realizing that I would not have to watch Brian Kelly. Although I am also an LSU fan I will be pulling for Florida State.
ND fan in the South says:
Hate to say it but I believe Kelly will have a NC at LSU…and soon. Look at his 5 stars all around.
D.Gremillon says:
Maybe we will see Hartman and Greathouse on the cover of Time magazine like we saw Hanratty and Seymore in 1965. Is Time magazine still around?
mike says:
1966
Michael Kem-Thomas says:
Great to have you back again, Mr. Vannie. The analyses you provide are an indispensable part of every ND football season. I don’t have the football knowledge that you do, but I just felt really good about yesterday’s game. I saw preparation and toughness. I think a truly outstanding season is not out of the question.
VegasPoker74 says:
Perhaps Golden’s 99% run commit defense against Navy made the defensive backfield look worse than they actually are…at least I hope so.
Jim Canfield says:
SH looked as good as advertised and for the 1st game impressive. My normal start-of-game anxiety, regardless of the opponent disappeared after the first set of downs. First time since BQ. The defense did not look lost on every play with the triple option, probably because they had time to prepare. Still, no chance of evaluating the team overall until SC State.
However, I have mixed feelings about these last-minute transfers. They obviously provide much-needed experience as evidenced by Cohen and Hartman but at what cost? What does this do to the mind of a 5-star recruit?
PF Steve says:
Great to have you both back, John and Mike!
One Historian says:
I don’t know if this is true but it could be:
1989 Super Bowl. Cincy has gone ahead with under 2 minutes to go. Their offense is standing on the sideline and somebody says “We’ve just won the Super Bowl.”
Somebody else (Chris Collinsworth?) says “don’t be so sure – have you seen who’s playing quarterback for San Francisco?”
As I said – I don’t really know if it’s true but it could be.
Jimmy P says:
Just out of curiosity, was anyone else bothered by the fact that Angeli didn’t get to play until the last 3 minutes of the game? I really though the game was in hand halfway through the third and was hoping our back up QB could get some meaningful playing time instead of garbage time snaps. I would have preferred to see Angeli for two real series and Minchey for the last two minutes. It was a little frustrating seeing Hartman stroll out there an risk injury in the fourth quarter. (Think Navy / Ron Powlus) So much of the season rest on his ability. Trotting him out there in the 4th quarter was unnecessary, especially when you could also get the backups some much needed experience.
irishhawk50 says:
Agree…hopefully will get some real reps against Tennessee State.
GREGORY SCHATZ says:
tat would be 1966 Mr Gramillion……
Allan Horney says:
I’ve read this site for years and generally thought the observations were logical, however, I’ve always felt it has a snarky, uppity, “we know more than you” kind of attitude as well. Its a little much at times.
A few samples:
1. The writer says the missed field goal “will carry doubt into the next game.” Why even say that? He’s a new kid–he’ll be fine over time like all these other kids.
2. There are still “areas of concern.” Wow—its game 1–really? That’s true in every game, everywhere, every time. Its silly.
3. Another mention of Kelly? Why? Let’s get over Kelly.
4. “Briefly impressed by Burnham and Mickey” Sort of condescending–ain’t it? Its game 1. They’ll either be fine or they won’t!
5. “Ramon Henderson was simply invisible.” I wonder if his parents thought he was invisible? I would guess they’re fairly proud.
Enough from me.
John Vannie says:
We’ll, at least you’re right about one thing – I do know more than you.
Allan horney says:
And there you have it!
John Vannie says:
Although you still don’t get it.
If you are looking for a rah-rah homer website, you’re in the wrong place. Most readers here understand and appreciate that.
As for the missed field goal by Schrader, he is not a new kid. He graduated from South Florida where he kicked for four years. I would venture to say his first field goal attempt for Notre Dame was the biggest kick of his life. I’m sorry he missed it but there will be others to follow that will be much more important. It’s fair to ask whether he is up to the task on such a big stage. Kickers can be very unpredictable. Your empty assertion that he will be just fine is an insult to most other readers here.
Yes, there are areas of concern, This season will be judged on the basis of three games, and Navy was not one of them. Most fans understand this perfectly well. My job is to look at how ND will match up with those three teams (OSU, USC, and Clemson). There are positions that concern me, most notably at safety. ND is very weak there and will be vulnerable to OSU and USC in particular. We didn’t get a feel for the pass rush capability against Navy but it needs to be strong against those two teams. Last year it was not and ND has largely the same personnel in 2023. Also, the linebackers (particularly Bertrand) do not play well in space and are frequently exposed by opponents of that caliber. On offense, ND’s passing game will be much better if Tobias Merriweather emerges as a legitimate deep threat. So far, including this game and reports I’ve been privy to from fall camp, he has disappointed. All of these are concerns to me and to readers who still hope to win a national title. That is still the goal and the standard.
The Kelly era reference was appropriate. Tom Rees was a holdover from that period and last year’s offense looked much the same. It was refreshing to see something new and improved. I’ve read many similar sentiments expressed during the last couple of days by writers I respect.
Regarding Burnham and Mickey, neither had many snaps during the game but stood out when they had the opportunity. That was worth mentioning. I would like to see both get more playing time on the basis of their performances on Saturday. There was nothing condescending about it. Their participation was indeed brief but they made the most of it.
Lastly, Ramon Henderson played more than half of the defensive snaps but did not have one tackle or assist. That’s uncommon for a safety but unfortunately not for Ramon. Anyway, Mrs. Henderson, your son was indeed invisible by all objective criteria. Deal with it.
Again, you might want to visit a different site where the writers are essentially cheerleaders. That’s not who I am and I don’t apologize for it.
P.S. I believe I showed remarkable restraint in this reply for not calling you a whiny little bitch.
The Obvious says:
Got your ire up a tad, Mr. Vannie.
John Vannie says:
There’s always one sanctimonious weasel every year who wants to put me in my place. LOL.
bocceman2 says:
Best O-line play in a long time. Granted it was Navy but no false starts or holding calls or blown assignments were a big shift from prior days. Never understood the hype around him.
Also did not miss Reese or purple faced Kelly. Let’s Go Irish!
Bob Birge says:
Kelly came to Notre Dame with a good record and for the most part had a good record as the Irish coach. He did a really good job of winning the games he was supposed to, so give him credit for that. Of course, that is not how Notre Dame coaches are judged, and, as we all know, he did a dreadful job in big games. Behind that, he was just difficulty to like with his arrogant personality. A couple days ago, I read a story that he alienated Joe Montana, which is unconscionable. Ultimately, Marcus Freeman will be judged on his won-loss record, but he seems to be so much more of a people person that Kelly and thus much easier to like. I mean, everybody liked Mike Brey as a person, even if he stayed three or four years too long.
ND fan in the South says:
Kelly never really liked to recruit. Marcus puts recruiting at the very top of his list and he is good at it and requires his assistants to recruit hard. Hopefully, this will give ND long term success. But Kelly is now somewhere (LSU) where recruiting can happen much easier…minimal academic restrictions, a good local and regional talent base, and a school with NC history. It will be much easier for Kelly to win a NASH.
Monty B. says:
What is being done to ensure this second game isn’t like the second game last year? Just like now, there was presumptous talk last year about the B team playing the second half, blowout score, yada yada. What happened last year can’t be allowed to happen again. Is there anything specific being done to address that?
ND fan in the South says:
I watched the post game presser with MF. He emphasized that he and his coaches make sure the players know that the next play is most important play of the game.