Irish Turn Back Purdue

Notre Dame was far from dominant on Saturday, but the Irish stopped Purdue when it counted for a 23-12 victory in the season opener for both teams. Brian Kelly’s squad showed considerable improvement in the running game, and the performance of both the defense and special teams was very encouraging. Quarterback Dayne Crist looked sharp in the first half, but his lack of experience in the pocket was evident later when the Boilermakers mounted a comeback. Fortunately for Notre Dame, this year’s team does not have to rely entirely on the quarterback’s individual efforts to win a ballgame.

Both offenses sputtered early, but the Irish received a boost late in the first quarter when Darrin Walls intercepted a pass by Purdue’s Robert Marve deep in Irish territory. Cierre Wood came in at running back for his first collegiate action and proceeded to rip off runs of 15, 16 and 13 yards. Starter Armando Allen apparently got the message, because he returned to the game and immediately ripped off a 22-yard touchdown run to give Notre Dame a 7-0 advantage.

 The teams exchanged short field goals in second quarter as the defenses held firm, and the Irish extended their lead to 13-3 just before intermission with a 46 yarder by David Ruffer. Notre Dame appeared ready to blow it open in the third period when the defense sacked Marve on consecutive plays and Allen returned a punt for 40 yards behind a good effort block by Prince Shembo. Crist capped the subsequent 30-yard drive with a 5-yard toss to TJ Jones for a 20-3 lead less than five minutes into the second half.

The Irish defensive line asserted itself once again by sacking Marve, but an apparent fumble and defensive score was correctly reversed by the replay officials. Purdue was forced to punt from its end zone, however, and Notre Dame took over near midfield. A long pass from Crist to Michael Floyd carried into the red zone, but Floyd lost control of the ball without contact two plays later after another reception that appeared to be destined for six points.

The Boilermakers responded to the gift by driving the length of the field, only to turn the ball over themselves near the Irish goal line on the first play of the fourth quarter. Gary Gray deflected a pass into the massive arms of nose tackle Ian Williams, and Notre Dame survived the threat unscathed. Well, almost. Allen could not get out of his own end zone on the ensuing play as the blocking broke down in front of him. The safety closed the gap to 20-5, and Purdue took over after the kickoff in good position.

Marve moved his team into scoring position, and called his own number from the Irish 23 on a fourth and one play. The packed-in Notre Dame defense was caught flat-footed and Marve raced untouched into the end zone. Leading now by only 20-12, the Irish caught a break when Marve’s celebration penalty pushed Purdue’s kickoff back 15 yards. Wood broke off a good return only to be stripped of the ball, but the Irish luck continued when Zeke Motta recovered at the Boilermaker 41.

With the game on the line, Purdue held firm by sacking Crist twice in the next series. Notre Dame’s defense, which had been on the field for a considerable part of the second half, managed to hold on as Walls defended two heart-stopping deep passes by Marve against in single coverage. Allen then reasserted himself behind a more bullish Irish offensive line, and Ruffer iced the game by drilling a 37-yard field goal with 4:30 remaining for a 23-12 advantage. Purdue’s last gasps fell short and Crist knelt down with the ball to secure Kelly’s first win in South Bend.

Each team cost itself a probable touchdown by turning the ball over near the opponent’s five yard line, and the offenses were generally inconsistent. The Irish enjoyed a clear advantage in the running game, both in talent and execution. The lopsided difference in the defensive secondaries was also evident, as Notre Dame’s group covered and tackled much more effectively than the inexperienced visitors.

Let’s review the answers to the pregame questions regarding the keys to victory:

Will Crist’s passing allow Irish fans to forget about Clausen? – Crist’s passing was quite good (19 of 26 for 205 yards and one TD) but his pocket presence and decision making need some work.

Will Marve struggle after a year on the sidelines? – Yes. He threw 42 passes for only 220 yards, and the two interceptions occurred deep in Irish territory.

Can Notre Dame run the ball successfully, especially in the fourth quarter? – I’m quite happy to answer in the affirmative.

Will the Irish help create a new star for Purdue at running back? – Purdue ran for only 102 net yards, and Ralph Bolden’s job is safe whenever he returns to the lineup.

Can the Irish offensive tackles hold up against Kerrigan and Gooden? – Purdue had its moments with the safety and a couple of sacks, but Martin and Dever competed well overall. Crist also held the ball too long on occasion.

Will Notre Dame’s defenders play physically and exhibit solid tackling fundamentals? – The secondary was exceptional, but the linebackers missed a few chances that will be run continuously in the film room this week.

Will the Irish special teams finally show some improvement? – Ruffer was outstanding and the return teams actually featured some real blocking.

Will Notre Dame’s attitude and energy level under Kelly be improved from recent lackluster campaigns, and can they sustain it through four quarters? – Yes, and that is good because the defense really had no choice. Purdue won the time of possession battle by a full ten minutes.

Other positives for Notre Dame included the absence of penalties and mental breakdowns. The defensive line and secondary were much better than last season, and the offensive line held its own against a representative front seven. Jones, Theo Riddick and Duval Kamara showed they can contribute and divert attention from Floyd and Kyle Rudolph. Wood has great burst and shiftiness at running back while Allen remains solid. I would like to see a big back take some snaps in the red zone, and was disappointed that Crist ran the ball (unsuccessfully) inside the ten on two occasions where the offense ultimately failed to score a touchdown.

Michigan comes to town next week, and we’ll find out which team is really ready to take a major step forward after a couple of forgettable seasons.

Categories

19 thoughts on “Irish Turn Back Purdue

  1. I Think it was nice to finally see a ND team play some fundimental football. Yeah Crist can improve on his play but if the question is can he make fans forget about Clausen then answer is YES. If you think back to Jimmy’s first game he had a line with just as much experience and was sacked on what felt like every other play, so i would say that dane is already close to Jimmy’s second year form. if crist can improved, like he should then by the end of the year people will be saying Jimmy who

    • I really missed JC’s fade…it looked like a rainbow unlike Crist who throws a rocket to the corner and over the head of everyone – it will come but I miss that throw and I’m sure Floyd misses it right now also. GO IRISH!!!

  2. The only discouraging performance of the day, in my opinion, was Teo. Missed way too many tackles. He may be the most important Irish player on the field next week against Michigan, as he’s the only one with the speed and ability to shadow Robinson.

  3. Crist desperately needs to develop better ‘touch’ on his passes.

    In the 1st half, he appeared to be trying to throw the ball THROUGH his receivers. Throwing hard is OK, but trying to put a gaping hole between the numbers on your receivers jerseys is not a positive asset for the QB or his targets.

    In addition, his overthrowing the ball, e.g. sailing it WAY over the head of his intended receivers (like Floyd), especially in the red zone, just has to be corrected.

    Also, Allen had flashes of brilliance (like last year) where his determination to get yardage was apparent. Unfortunately, there were plays where he looked like a replica of himself from 2 years ago, where, when he was touched at the point of attack, he gave up and fell down. He needs to be last year’s Armando – all the time.

    All-in-all I was pleased with the energy, conditioning and performance of the team. Cierre Wood was amazing. I’m surprised he didn’t get more playing time. He deserved better blocking for those hand-offs in the backfield, however. There is an area where the Oline and the backs need more work.

    The tackling was 1000000% better than it has been for the past 8 years and the special teams looked good, especially on punt and kickoff coverage. I just wish we could get a kicker who would consistently put the ball out of the end zone on kickoffs and/or force more touchbacks. It was great to see that field goals were no longer random successes.

    Michigan, if they play the way they did against UConn, will provide a formidable opponent. It should be an interesting game …

  4. A thorough analysis. You might have mentioned the most significant improvement I saw — great tackling. Tackling on first contact. Tackling on special teams. Tackling in the backfield. A decent start.
    Go Irish, beat Michigan!

  5. Good analysis. I also noticed the Crist rushes in the red zone. We really could have used Robert Hughes in those situations. I think the most encouraging thing about the game was the fact that the team didn’t roll over in the 4th quarter. They weathered a strong Purdue comeback and held on to win.

  6. All in, it was an average result at best against Purdue.

    All that said….I wouldnt expect us to be great. Frankly, all the good coaches struggled in Year 1. Look at Holtz at SoCarolina (0-11), Saban at Bama (7-6), Meyer at Florida (9-3 with #1 type talent), Alvarez at Wisconsin (1-10), Butch Davis at UNC (4-8), Schnellenberger at Louisville (2-9), McCartney at Colorado (2-8-1), Stoops at OU (7-6), Mack Brown at UNC (1-10 for 2 years), Jimmy Johnson at The U (8-5), Johnny Majors at UT (4-7)….and Holtz at ND (5-6). It takes time and you shouldnt miracles. Ara in ’64 was lightning in a bottle.

    The rushing game didnt appear to be all that great given we only rushed for 155yds. When it felt like the rushing game struggled, we immediately returned to the passing game with quick slants, as opposed to having confidence we could drive them off the ball consistently.

    The truth is that all ND fans prefer a running game where the Irish are able to rush the ball whenever we want to, not just when we need to. And I still don’t feel like that’s the case.

    As for next week, its a huge positive for us that Michigan played UConn. We’ve seen the video and know that the best way to beat UM is to CONTAIN Robinson, not try to tackle him for a loss. I think Michigan is going to beat us, but the 3-4, if executed correctly by Fleming and Neal/Smith/Filer, will mean that UM is in alot of 3rd and 8 situations. If that’s the case we’ll do okay. Otherwise, we’re in trouble.

    All in, I’m more concerned about how we do against MSU than UM, even if we were to lose the UM game.

    GO IRISH.

  7. 51 years an Irish fan, this game made me feel that it is not long before we are very competitive, the Irish are an interesting team, Purdue has generally played them tough over the years, I never felt threatened in this one.
    ND has 2 weeks in which we will know about character and skill, Michigan and State take this game very serious when these two are done we will know where our season is headed.

  8. Donald Lechman says:

    It’s too early to tell where the team is headed. The defense showed vast improvement but not late in the gtame. Running game looks sharp. Crist needs to pass to Floyd more and, of course, Rudolph. The key to the whole season is defense. If we play good defense, we have a chance.

  9. Only two penalties (both on special teams). When was the last time the D and the O did not have a penalty, let alone in a season opener?

  10. I would not get too excited about this win. In ND’s opening game last year, they ND defense allowed fewer points and yards scored against it and the offense scored more points. The following week, ND lost to Michigan. Purdue and Nevada from last year are pretty comparable teams. All the Purdue game does is keep the status quo. If ND can now beat Michigan, then I think that would be a stepping stone. If they can beat MU and MSU, then that is the start to what could be a strong season. I hope we can all think of it this way, otherwise we will get carried away like we have the last 15 years.

    • Purdue was a much more fundamentally sound team than Nevada was last year. And you had both offense and defense operating under new systems. Last year they had been in those systems before. Purdue made few mistakes also, and I can see them causing some trouble in the Big 11(12). The fact that our fundamentals were better than any I have seen since Lou, answers my biggest question. If that continues, the future will be bright, no matter what happens the next two weeks, or for that matter the season. Sound football will eventually get us back.

  11. Interesting game. Both teams struggled offensively and either one, really, could have taken control at some point. Notre Dame had a few key takeaways and that was the difference in the game. Crist looks like a great quarterback. . . .Sure his finesse isn’t there yet but he sure looks like he’s got a lot of raw talent.

    Now, I am excited that we won the game — and that we won the game by more than a touchdown. But, when I watched Boise/Va Tech last night, I saw two teams that look better than we do at this stage of the season. We don’t need to be where these two teams are to have significant improvement.

    Michigan, I believe, will be quicker and more difficult to defend. Our guys up front — the big three — are going to have their hands full. And, the linebackers are going to have to get at the QB when he scrambles. But, assuming that they continue to improve (these guys have really only been running the system for four weeks), I feel great about Michigan next week. It’s an opportunity to pick up a big win.

  12. One game is one game but you can’t argue that the team was much more focused and sound then the product we have seen the last three years. Remember this is just a launching point and I would say it is a pretty good one.

    Also how can anyone say Boise payed at a higher level in their first game….they had like 11 penalties that really hurt them. Fortunately they have an experienced QB with the moxy to lead them on the final drive.

    We executed really well for a game one. Crist looked better than a lot of 3rd year starters. I loved the focus as ‘lapses’ have been part of the problem at ND for so many years.

    Now, interesting thing is I thought many of the same things after Chuck’s first game. I think the bar needs to be set at more than just one game or even one season success. The bar needs to be set at sustained success and I think Kelly gets that.

    The suddenly resurgent SkunkBears will test us to be sure. I have seen every MI ND game played since Holtz was hired and been to a few in person including the hated 17-17 tie. I don’t mean to say we don’t play hard against MI but every time we beat them it is because they do wacky/stupid stuff and beat themselves. That will be the key Saturday. If we just play sound, error free football like we did against Purdue then we will beat them because they will do something bone headed and give the game away……they have a complex where we are concered and it will be on full display this year.

    The thing you gotta love about Kelly is he has probably seen it all as far as exotic schemes. I say this because places like Div II do more unconventional things and that is where Kelly cooked his ‘exotic’ offense. So they will have a good gameplan to limit D-Rob. So what he had his first good game against bottom 1/2 compittion….lets see what he does this week…..if he tears us up then I will shut up but I think not.

    ND 33 MI 25