yes, in reading the article that seems to be the main idea

yes, in reading the article that seems to be the main idea
by jt (2019-02-05 10:09:06)

In reply to: It's a nice political stunt anyway. posted by NDMike2001

the NCAA is a private institution so in theory they could still ban the kids but the idea is that she is trying to put pressure on them.

Personally I think that finding a solution to the issue is something that Notre Dame should be leading the way on; image and likeness seems pretty reasonable to me and they could even pattern something after the way the Olympic athletes do it.

Replies:

I think you need a player's union to take the lead ... - debo 2019-02-05 12:49:12
- "abused" - jt 2019-02-05 13:46:34
  - In reality, Nike wouldn’t be paying for their likeness. - debo 2019-02-05 13:58:35
    - how is that abuse? - jt 2019-02-05 15:09:10
      - The abuse I'm talking about is destroying any semblance ... - debo 2019-02-06 09:41:46
        you're creating boogey men - jt 2019-02-06 10:32:42
Money source? - joend85 2019-02-05 10:31:01
- that seems pretty obvious to me - jt 2019-02-05 10:55:22
  - You may as well disband the NCAA and start up ... - debo 2019-02-05 13:11:09
    - I'd be all for disbanding that cartel * - jt 2019-02-05 16:47:11
  - For me, the question is where on the communism v free market - Tex Francisco 2019-02-05 11:28:00
- Whoever is using the athlete's likeness pays. - bigjinx74 2019-02-05 10:37:33
  - That's not how pro sports works for merchandise. - Tex Francisco 2019-02-05 11:23:37
    - players have to agree to be a part of that licensing - jt 2019-02-05 13:45:00
    - The entity with the rights still pays, correct? * - bigjinx74 2019-02-05 11:29:00
      - I don't know exactly. - Tex Francisco 2019-02-05 11:37:05
        Right, I understand that money may get filtered. - bigjinx74 2019-02-05 11:42:01