"Doctor's Kid Syndrome"
by Brahms (2019-09-22 18:07:27)

In reply to: Cue Aretha Franklin ...  posted by CJC


Sorry. I don't buy into the entitlement argument regarding any respect we should be afforded.

Our legacy is one to build on, not one that entitles us to deference in perpetuity.

In my academic and professional life, 75% of the time I have met the child of a doctor, that person presents themselves as being the child of a respected professional and, regardless of their own professional accomplishments, expects deference by virtue of their winnings in the genetic lottery. Often such persons have done little to build on that legacy, but feel entitled to deference just the same. It's a bizarre, misguided, insular, Peter Pan, kind of arrogance. I call this "doctor's kid" syndrome.

Outside of a museum or sports anthology, no one owes us deference for what we did 30 years ago. That attitude has in fact led to the Disney-fication of our program, and the legions of dumb-ass decisions that have led to our recent legacy.

It's fine to have to be asked to earn respect, especially given all that we have squandered lately, and the complete ass Monk made of the program ("ashamed to be Notre Dame"), and then Jack ("show the world how to do a HC search"), and on and on.

Schedule the best teams we can, regardless of geography. Don't avoid teams that don't naturally feel inclined to give us an obligatory "atta boy" just because they want to celebrate our brand.








My position on the state of Notre Dame football ...
by CJC  (2019-09-22 18:29:32)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post

on this board ought to be pretty clear.

In fact, it's caused me to become a persona non grata around the athletic department.

It's got nothing to do with "deference."

It has to do with fans knowledgeable enough to realize that Notre Dame, despite wandering in the desert for 30 years, is worthy of respect as an iconic program.

That respect doesn't translate to points on the field, bumps in the polls, points on the betting lines or berths in the playoff field.

Obviously, I'm talking about fans and to a lesser degree, institutions, who have no ability to grant those things, even if they were inclined -- and they shouldn't be.

But we shouldn't be spending our time or money or giving the platform (ho-hum, another record crowd with "irrelevant" Notre Dame in town) to institutions and fan bases that are too fucking stupid to realize and appreciate who we are -- current state of the program notwithstanding.


I don’t agree with your position.
by Brahms  (2019-09-22 19:46:44)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post

In fact I think it’s at the base of our current malaise.


To make your position explicit...
by Kbyrnes  (2019-09-22 20:21:36)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post

...Do you mind saying whether you believe that support for Notre Dame's historic position in college football, and for the idea that this particular part of ND's history deserves respect, is what is at the base of our current malaise?


Think harder. *
by CJC  (2019-09-22 19:51:43)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post


We're in such a weird time at ND. The respect earned
by cj  (2019-09-22 18:48:52)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post

comes from that which kelly, jenkins and saucy are trying to distance us from...
Creating new traditions, dispensing with old traditions, attempting to make everyone thrilled with 9-3...sell everything in sight...among other crap... it's a total clusterfu** strategy. Throw in a program that was pulverized by the NCAA, a HC who isn't owed the respect of anyone and you've got today's ND.
Respect what we are today because of guys like Joe Montana's legacy... hmm, how respectful has this program been to him? How many lifelong generational season ticket holders were unceremoniously jettisoned without so much as a thank you for decades of support...
I could go on and on, but respect for this current program needs to be earned. We have great kids and failed leadership...
Peeking over the fence and in and looking at the existing regime please tell me where the respect should come from.

PS after Claypool made the play of the game ND started their drive and Finke got tackled and twisted up a bit. It was very sporting to see #26 offer his hand to pull Finke up. Well done.


Great post.
by revressbo  (2019-09-22 21:19:45)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post

It’s so weird. We try to sell ourselves as, “we’re Notre Dame! We’re different!” while our actions try to standardize us to the way everyone else does it. We live off our history for purposes of branding/marketing/respect, but don’t seem to care whether our current product matches those standards as long as we were “in the conversation” or close or competitive or whatever.

We’re trying to have our cake and eat it.


"We're the new legends of old Notre Dame." 1-18 vs Top 5
by cj  (2019-09-22 22:13:14)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post

teams since 2000.

"New legends..."

Where the hell do these people come from?

We've never won anything, but we're legends. The program used to be run by Giants. Now it's run by phony wannabes.

The Who vs Milli Vanilli...


I agree 100%. ND played an outsize role in the...
by Kbyrnes  (2019-09-22 18:48:15)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post

...history and development of college football as we know it today. It will deserve respect for that aspect of its football history for a long time to come. How much respect the recent and current operation deserves, and how such respect (or lack thereof) is allotted among the characters on the stage, is another question.


I don't think it's a question of an "atta boy"
by El Kabong  (2019-09-22 18:09:03)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post

I think it's more about being treated with the standard-human-being levels of respect.


if that's what he means...
by Brahms  (2019-09-22 18:15:26)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post

...basic respect for other teams fans -- basically, being classy hosts, and classy opponents -- then I have no problem with that.


Same.
by Steel_City_Irish  (2019-09-22 18:45:50)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post

My statement above was more about respect based on results on the field the last 30 years.